Teams

Indy X40 7.0 IND Laird

Spring USTA Central Indiana Mixed 40 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 7.0, SP

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-08vs Indy X40 7.0 IRCE BarteltLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Bellinski / Saurav Shankar vs Catherine McCann / Adin McCann3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHoward Oberst / Kathleen Eldridge vs Charles Hinkle / Kelly Owens4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAntonio Menendez / Andrea Burow vs Richard Martin / Stacia O'Donnell6-2, 6-4
2026-05-01vs Indy X40 7.0 IRCD JacksonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Lynn Anderson / ERIC MORRIS vs Dennis Seipel / Christy Seipel6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHoward Oberst / Donna Laird vs Kimberly Andersen / Thu Han Aung6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-24vs Indy X40 7.0 IRCD CopelandLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Bellinski / Antonio Menendez vs Joe Copeland / Mariko Tsuyuki3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Noel / Gwendolen Morris vs Anand Bala / Katie Filler6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Fisher / Aakif Rangoonwala vs Michael Taylor / Kikuko Campbell3-6, 3-6
2026-04-17vs Indy X40 7.0 IHP PoeLost 12
W#1 DoublesSaurav Shankar / Amy Bellinski vs Brad Matheny / Kelley Williams6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTodd Lothery / Mary Lynn Anderson vs Jeff Akers / Susan Akers4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Noel / Donna Laird vs Dennis Poe / Lisa Warrum5-7, 5-7
2026-04-10vs Indy X40 7.0 CRC KimLost 02
L#1 DoublesSaurav Shankar / Amy Bellinski vs Joshua McShane / Beth Pychinka2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesERIC MORRIS / Gwendolen Morris vs Matt Zacarias / Tracy Fulling2-6, 3-6
2026-03-27vs Indy X40 7.0 IRCD CookLost 03
L#1 DoublesGwendolen Morris / Aakif Rangoonwala vs Masumi Makio / John Covert2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Burow / Adam Fairfield vs Cheryl Miller / John Correa3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Eldridge / Howard Oberst vs Sun Park / Young Park3-6, 6-7
2026-03-20vs Indy X40 7.0 IRCD InselbergLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Laird / Howard Oberst vs Richard Curtiss / Erin Kremer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Bellinski / Todd Lothery vs Erica Curtiss / Sean Sullivan0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 7.0, SP
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Inselberg6117411150
2Indy X40 7.0 IHP Poe6114719179
3Indy X40 7.0 CRC Kim5215616163
4Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Copeland4314717181
5Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Cook34101123190
6Indy X40 7.0 IRCE Bartelt2561532230
7Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Jackson2561534225
8Indy X40 7.0 IND Laird0721938238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Amy Bellinski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Aakif Rangoonwala
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Saurav Shankar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Kathleen Eldridge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Theresa McMahon
published
3.03
Andrea Burow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Donna Laird
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Todd Lothery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Gwendolen Morris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Antonio Menendez
published 3
Howard Oberst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kyle Fisher
published
Mary Lynn Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Bellinski + Saurav Shankar9259% games+4.5% vs expected
Aakif Rangoonwala + Donna Laird3353% games+1.8% vs expected
Howard Oberst + Donna Laird31940% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Fisher + Saurav Shankar8654% gamesnot enough data
Theresa McMahon + Todd Lothery2845% gamesnot enough data
Todd Lothery + Amy Bellinski7259% gamesnot enough data
Antonio Menendez + Amy Bellinski4255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Lynn Anderson + Todd Lothery1438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Bellinski
62W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Aakif Rangoonwala
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Saurav Shankar
46W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Kathleen Eldridge
27W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Theresa McMahon
30W–63L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrea Burow
75W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Donna Laird
40W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Todd Lothery
35W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Gwendolen Morris
20W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Antonio Menendez
14W–22L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Howard Oberst
54W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Fisher
84W–105L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Lynn Anderson
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.