Teams

WP-C BLUE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-04vs GPTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesLionel Pomerantz / Kellen Iverson vs Eric Fonacier / Jack Butler2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRaghav Mathur / John Welch vs Jeff Turner / Bret Chen6-4, 6-6
2025-08-20vs APR-MW GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Whitmer / Ben Henry vs David Morrison / Jack Hwang6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKellen Iverson vs Tony Ferrufino3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Welch / Nicholas Jacobson vs Bruce Eldredge / Kevin Matney7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-13vs GTC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesKellen Iverson / Nicholas Jacobson vs David Baker / Suresh Gevaran6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBen Henry vs Cole Egger6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLionel Pomerantz / John Welch vs Ian Graffagna / Bruce Silver6-4, 6-3
2025-08-06vs CACM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesBen Henry / Lionel Pomerantz vs Brian Wylie / Craig Stromberg3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Dirk McDermott4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarcus McAskin / Matt Whitmer vs Brian Berglund / Kendall Lin6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-30vs WP-C GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLionel Pomerantz / John Welch vs Zachary Horn / Grant Petersen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKellen Iverson vs John Wharton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicholas Jacobson / Matt Whitmer vs Benjamin Smith / Vincent Vuong6-0, 6-2
2025-07-23vs WP ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesKellen Iverson / John Welch vs Christopher McCarthy / Max Volino6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRaghav Mathur vs Zachary Copman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBen Henry / Marcus McAskin vs Clifford Goldberg / Ryan MacDowell0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ben Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.78
Raghav Mathur
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Kellen Iverson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.72
Marcus McAskin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Matt Whitmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Lionel Pomerantz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nicholas Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Henry
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Raghav Mathur
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Kellen Iverson
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.77
4
Marcus McAskin
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Matt Whitmer
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lionel Pomerantz
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Nicholas Jacobson
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.