Teams

Assaf 4.0

2024 Adult 40&Over-PB · Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-30vs Pinebelt 40-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Delk / Orjan McCarty vs David Johns / Todd Johns1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Miller / Randy Robinett vs Stephen Coleman / Robert Stokes2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEd Assaf / Ben Norval vs Jesse Migues / Troy Sides3-6, 4-6
2024-04-28vs Pinebelt 40-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Delk / Orjan McCarty vs Stephen Coleman / Robert Stokes1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Miller / Randy Robinett vs David Thomas / Scott Stanton1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEd Assaf / Robert Simmons vs Orlando Andy / Francis Hemeter0-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs Pinebelt 40-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Miller / Randy Robinett vs Stephen Coleman / Francis Hemeter2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJay Delk / Robert Simmons vs Scott Stanton / David Thomas1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesOrjan McCarty / Ed Assaf vs Troy Sides / Orlando Andy2-6, 0-6
2024-04-06vs Pinebelt 40-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesOrjan McCarty / Robert Simmons vs Brendan Fay / Jesse Migues2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEd Assaf / Alfonso Preziosi vs David Johns / Todd Johns3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBen Norval / Jamie Massengale vs Scott Stanton / David Thomas2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pinebelt 40-4.040160036
2Assaf 4.00401632192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Orjan McCarty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Alfonso Preziosi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Ed Assaf
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Jamie Massengale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ben Norval
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Randy Robinett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jay Delk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Massengale + Alfonso Preziosi404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Orjan McCarty
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Alfonso Preziosi
35W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Ed Assaf
19W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Jamie Massengale
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ben Norval
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Robinett
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Jay Delk
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.