Teams

IE-Ashley Rodriguez

Fall Flex Singles · Womens 3.0

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs IE-Sara CurryWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Sara Curry6-1, 6-2
2024-12-07vs IE-Lydia WongWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Lydia Wong6-3, 6-2
2024-11-30vs IE-Vanessa CastanedaWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Vanessa Castaneda6-2, 6-2
2024-10-19vs IE-Vanessa CastanedaWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Vanessa Castaneda6-1, 6-1
2024-10-15vs IE-Sara CurryWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Sara Curry6-4, 6-2
2024-10-12vs IE-Lydia WongWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Rodriguez vs Lydia Wong6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Rodriguez
14W–1L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.