Teams

Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 65 & over · 4.0 Mxd Wed PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-15vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Register / Arthur Bingham vs Mark Teears / Lynne Murray5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRon Mangrum / Sherrie Kruse vs Keevie Martin / Robin Andree0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Eberhard / Charles Bolton vs Sallye Parker / Charles Dawson4-6, 6-7
2026-07-14vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Ted Irvin vs Keevie Martin / Robin Andree4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Register / Arthur Bingham vs Amanda Reynolds / Charles Dawson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPam McAmis / Brad McAmis vs Evelyn Strader / Mark Teears2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-01vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMinerva Loran / Brad McAmis vs Mark Teears / Lynne Murray0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRon Mangrum / Sherrie Kruse vs Sallye Parker / Charles Dawson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeecher Owen / Pam McAmis vs Evelyn Strader / Robin Andree2-6, 6-7
2026-06-24vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMinerva Loran / Charles Bolton vs Lynne Murray / Charles Dawson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPam McAmis / Arthur Bingham vs Keevie Martin / Stanley Marrow6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Ron Mangrum vs Evelyn Strader / Peter Glud3-6, 1-6
2026-06-17vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Register / Arthur Bingham vs Mark Teears / Lynne Murray5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Eberhard / Ted Irvin vs Sallye Parker / Charles Dawson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGwen Highsmith-Quick / John W Quick vs Keevie Martin / Robin Andree3-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam McAmis / Brad McAmis vs Sallye Parker / Mark Teears3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMinerva Loran / Arthur Bingham vs Debbie Lane / David Lane6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Ted Irvin vs Evelyn Strader / Peter Glud6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Register / Arthur Bingham vs Mark Teears / Lynne Murray6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRon Mangrum / Sherrie Kruse vs Evelyn Strader / Peter Glud6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Bolton / Gwen Highsmith-Quick vs Stanley Marrow / Amanda Reynolds4-6, 1-6
2026-05-27vs Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam McAmis / Brad McAmis vs Charles Dawson / Sallye Parker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn W Quick / Gwen Highsmith-Quick vs Mark Teears / Lynne Murray1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Bolton / Minerva Loran vs David Lane / Evelyn Strader4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mxd Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Brad McAmis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Deborah Register
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Arthur Bingham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Pam McAmis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.68
Ted Irvin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Kimberly Eberhard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
John W Quick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Ron Mangrum
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Beecher Owen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathy Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherrie Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John W Quick + Gwen Highsmith-Quick0831% games−10.6% vs expected
Deborah Register + Arthur Bingham224 matchesnot enough data
Ron Mangrum + Sherrie Kruse213 matchesnot enough data
Brad McAmis + Pam McAmis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Deborah Register
208W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Arthur Bingham
9W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Ted Irvin
26W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Kimberly Eberhard
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
John W Quick
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Beecher Owen
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.