Teams

YMCA:Mosle:Jean

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.5

2 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-01-21vs YMCA:Correnti:WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Jean / Jennifer Mosle vs Noel Correnti / Nicole Driscoll6-8
2023-01-21vs GB:Quinn:FenigerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Jean / Jennifer Mosle vs Susan Feniger / Mary Quinn8-7
2023-01-21vs HH:Weisberg:Bogle JubinvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Jean / Jennifer Mosle vs Kimberly Bogle / Jessica Weisberg3-8
2022-11-20vs YMCA:NobertLost 01
L#3 DoublesNoel Correnti / Sandra Jean vs Patrice Ruff-Burbine / Amanda Lade-Sullivan6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-11-06vs GB:King:FrenchWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fontaine / Jennifer Mosle vs Christina King / Barbara Green7-5, 6-4
2022-10-30vs YMCA:NobertLost 02
L#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Sandra Jean vs Jennifer Henry / Nicole Ledoux2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mosle / Noel Correnti vs Ann Dahlen / Jana Suozzo1-6, 2-6
2022-10-23vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Fontaine / Jennifer Mosle vs Rebecca Helme / Susan Johanson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs GB:French:StoneWon 20
W#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Sandra Jean vs Molly French / Laura Stone6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNoel Correnti / Jennifer Mosle vs Andrea Grenier / Barbara Green1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-10-02vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mosle / Tammy Goldstein vs Colleen DeAngelis / Nancy Donahue6-4, 6-3
2022-09-25vs GB:King:FrenchWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Driscoll / Jennifer Mosle vs Laura Naismith / Ginger Iola6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Diva 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GB:OutOfTheKitchen:Green:Vandette303006
2YMCA:Murray:Suozzo3030010
3HH:Weisberg:Bogle Jubinville3030014
4YMCA:Lade:Sullivan2121114
5YMCA:Correnti:White2121115
6GB:Lafreniere:Carleton1111112
7MTS:Fougere:Dunlop1111113
8RVC:Chaltain:Acosta1111115
9YMCA:Radke:Radke1212223
10MTS:Scharpf:Valeri1212219
11YMCA:Allen:Fish1212222
12GB:French:Stone1212222
13YMCA:Mosle:Jean1212223
14Default000000
15MTS:Nippe:Valeri0303324
16GB:Quinn:Feniger0303324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Sandra Jean
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jennifer Mosle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mosle + Sandra Jean2346% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Jean
67W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Mosle
62W–33L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.