Teams

SoCal/Reznik/65&Over8.0W

2022 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 8.0 Weekend

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesRohinee Damle / Anne Folks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-30vs OC Marina Hills Nancy KanterWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Randi Reznik vs Yoko Ohigashi / Vicki Mingus6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCinda Churm / Rohinee Damle vs Elizabeth Frost / Kathleen Thurston6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSusan Mayer / Bette Kerhoulas vs Brenda Danielson / Nancy Peterson1-6, 4-6
2022-09-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesBette Kerhoulas / Carolyn Knutson vs Grace Hallum / Mimi Wagner6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRandi Reznik / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-23vs OC Marina Hills Nancy KanterSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Betty Youndt vs Brenda Danielson / Nancy Peterson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Mayer / Bette Kerhoulas vs Kathleen Thurston / Yoko Ohigashi6-7, 6-7
2022-09-10vs OC Marina Hills Nancy KanterWon 20
W#1 DoublesCinda Churm / Rohinee Damle vs Yoko Ohigashi / Nancy Kanter6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBette Kerhoulas / Betty Youndt vs Marilyn Bartholomew / Grace Hallum6-2, 6-4
2022-09-09vs OC Marina Hills Nancy KanterWon 20
W#1 DoublesCinda Churm / Bette Kerhoulas vs Brenda Danielson / Nancy Peterson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Smith / Rohinee Damle vs Vicki Mingus / Marianne Chaput6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 8.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bette Kerhoulas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Betty Youndt
published 4
Cinda Churm
published 4
Rohinee Damle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Randi Reznik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Youndt + Randi Reznik2364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bette Kerhoulas
62W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
149W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Betty Youndt
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Cinda Churm
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Rohinee Damle
49W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randi Reznik
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.