Teams

JCollins.5.0C-SVC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-21vs CWilliams-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Azariah Bell vs Traci Adams / Elisa Klein6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChrissy King / Elizabeth Misiti vs Anna Barzin / Andrea O'neal6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChloe Lao / Katherine Roberts vs Amanda Baker / Leah Sansbury6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-14vs THoltz-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanna Hess / Azariah Bell vs Tricia Holtz / Kate Upton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChloe Lao / Sarah Tuttle vs Amy Malsin / Shelley Palermo2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChrissy King / Elizabeth Misiti vs Amy Petkanas / Jamie Gilley6-4, 6-4
2026-08-07vs CKruse.18C-DFCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAzariah Bell / Janna Hess vs Jonda Young / Martha Martinez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Small / Katherine Roberts vs Meredith Altieri / Kim Rice0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CKruse.18C-DFC2042533
2JCollins.5.0C-SVC1133658
3CWilliams-UNC02151167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Azariah Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.42
Sarah Tuttle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Janna Hess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Vickie Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Chrissy King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.31
Cheryl Molinatto
published 2.5
2.28
Elizabeth Misiti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Chloe Lao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Brandi Vanderwalker
published 2.5
1.87
Lori Small
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy King + Elizabeth Misiti6358% games+11.8% vs expected
Chrissy King + Janna Hess213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Misiti + Janna Hess213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Azariah Bell
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Sarah Tuttle
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Janna Hess
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
54W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Chrissy King
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Cheryl Molinatto
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Elizabeth Misiti
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Chloe Lao
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Brandi Vanderwalker
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Small
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.