Teams

3DEER-MOLLICONE 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F2

2022 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN THURS AM SEM

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Abea Chou vs Jolanta Gallup / Gonjoo Jung1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Klimkowski / Margaret Mowbray vs Hisae Yoshihara / Vivian Marley6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Becky Cleason6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Keller / Shannon Morgan vs Suzy Roebuck / Kelly Halpern7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSusan Evans / Amy Finnerty vs Samantha Ruma / Meg Iverson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTatiana Canyon vs Anne Steffen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Theresa Nallamothu vs Heather Erickson / Tiffany Glime3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Carrie Ray6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAbea Chou / Melissa Klimkowski vs Stacey Slazinski / Julie Webb3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAmy Finnerty / Susan Evans vs Melissa Travers / Theresa McCorry6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTatiana Canyon vs Satoko Uno0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Anne Schlecht vs Monica Curtis / Merrilee Nay6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Bartolomeo vs Nora Manoukian1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesSusan Evans / Amy Finnerty vs Heather Erickson / Jessica Gibson6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Rheanon Parrino1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Miklas / Shannon Morgan vs Susie DeMarco / Samantha Ruma6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMargaret Mowbray vs Carrie Ray1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Anne Schlecht vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesShannon Morgan / Hannah Wright vs Miki Yaguchi / Sally Hermann0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Minlu Chen0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Finnerty / Margaret Mowbray vs Elizabeth Spiroff / Merrilee Nay6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTatiana Canyon vs Jill Brandenstein1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Andrea Duhaime vs Jen Zebari / Lori Woods6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMargaret Mowbray / Patricia Keller vs Jolanta Gallup / Gonjoo Jung1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Becky Cleason6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Burkett / Ann Miklas vs Hisae Yoshihara / Mary Weiser4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Theresa Nallamothu vs Suzy Roebuck / Janine Molloy3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMargaret Mowbray / Amy Finnerty vs Susie DeMarco / Samantha Ruma6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnn Miklas vs Rachel Klein6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Theresa Nallamothu vs Heather Erickson / Carrie Ray6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarrie Barnes vs Annie Charters6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAbea Chou / Shannon Morgan vs Stacey Slazinski / Tiffany Glime2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Theresa Nallamothu vs Suzie Cozart / Stacy Drummond2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Burkett / Ann Miklas vs Elizabeth Spiroff / Satoko Uno4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Bartolomeo vs Lori Woods0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Mowbray / Abea Chou vs Sally Hermann / Monica Curtis5-7, 1-6
2022-05-26vs 2CHIP-KIM 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F2Split 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Finnerty / Theresa Nallamothu vs Mary Weiser / Amy Storey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarmen Mollicone / Susan Evans vs Thu Kehn / Becky Cleason6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMargaret Mowbray vs Christine Kim6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarrie Barnes / Anne Schlecht vs Leigh Washabaugh / Janine Molloy6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 WOMEN THURS AM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13TROY-LAMAR 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F181331229293
24NAC-DRUMMOND 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F263252044376
31FAC-ERICKSON 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F254261947407
42CHIP-KIM 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F245232248390
54BRC-RILEY 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F145202557410
61SCWB-outside-LESNAU 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F136202556422
72SCWB-outside-COLE 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F136172862440
83DEER-MOLLICONE 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM F236162965443

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Margaret Mowbray
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Ann Miklas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Carrie Barnes
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Finnerty
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Klimkowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Patricia Keller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Wendy Burkett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Anne Schlecht
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Shannon Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Tatiana Canyon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Carmen Mollicone
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Abea Chou
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrea Duhaime
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Evans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tracy Bartolomeo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Evans + Wendy Burkett5158% games+17.9% vs expected
Susan Evans + Patricia Keller6356% games+17.1% vs expected
Ann Miklas + Shannon Morgan6262% games+14.4% vs expected
Wendy Burkett + Shannon Morgan2543% games+7.9% vs expected
Carrie Barnes + Margaret Mowbray161353% games+3.8% vs expected
Melissa Klimkowski + Margaret Mowbray191853% games−0.6% vs expected
Margaret Mowbray + Amy Finnerty9952% games−2.7% vs expected
Carmen Mollicone + Tracy Bartolomeo0628% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margaret Mowbray
141W–114L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Ann Miklas
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Carrie Barnes
60W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Finnerty
46W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Melissa Klimkowski
94W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Patricia Keller
39W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Wendy Burkett
72W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Anne Schlecht
63W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Shannon Morgan
39W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
Tatiana Canyon
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carmen Mollicone
35W–97L career · 9 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Abea Chou
8W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Andrea Duhaime
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Susan Evans
40W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Bartolomeo
6W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.