Teams

Escambia - RS/Cuny

2021 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-30vs Marino - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / Mecy Wimberly vs Kevin Groom / Elizabeth Elliott6-3, 6-2
2021-03-13vs Crooke - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Debbie Wroten vs Bradley Price / Ann Scott7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesArlene Doyle / Gordon Paulus vs Brent Scott / Tami McGhee7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2021-03-09vs Crooke - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Debbie Wroten vs Brent Scott / Tami McGhee7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Rick Cuny vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-03vs Stewart - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesArlene Doyle / Shane Russell vs Susan Nitterauer / Timothy Sumrall6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Debbie Wroten vs Renee Bradford / Michael Yager6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRick Cuny / Mecy Wimberly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-01-26vs Stewart - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / Mecy Wimberly vs Brad Bradford / Jennifer Passeretti6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCalvin Moore / Arlene Doyle vs Ali Kizilbash / Renee Bradford6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Wroten / John Wimberly vs Susan Nitterauer / Timothy Sumrall4-6, 3-6
2021-01-24vs Miller - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Cuny / Mecy Wimberly vs Brett Worley / Chelsea Simpson6-3, 6-1
2021-01-19vs Marino - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / Mecy Wimberly vs Tara Dominguez / Marco Fuentealba6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Arlene Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.01
Debbie Wroten
published 4
3.83
Rick Cuny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Gordon Paulus
published 4
3.67
Tonna Wheat
published
3.31
Calvin Moore
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shane Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mecy Wimberly + John Wimberly202250% games−5.0% vs expected
Rick Cuny + Debbie Wroten6944% gamesnot enough data
Rick Cuny + Mecy Wimberly8269% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Debbie Wroten
85W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
4.01
Rick Cuny
100W–65L career · 12 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Gordon Paulus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tonna Wheat
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
3.5
Calvin Moore
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 14 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Russell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.