Teams

SS-LT BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-22vs GCC TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Wilson / Stacy Burd vs Megan Ryall / Kristen Abell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLana Pierce / Ann Baldwin vs Heather Froehlich-Olmsted / Jennifer Steelman2-6, 4-6
2023-06-15vs LTFC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Burd / Amy Curd vs Brandi Renick-Smith / Ashley Agrelius6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Archibald / Lana Pierce vs Lori Bowling / Heidi Elliott7-6, 6-1
2023-06-08vs PTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Curd / Ann Baldwin vs Cathleen Cohen / Amy Kozlowski7-5, 6-1
2023-06-01vs CHCC SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacy Burd / Melissa Klein vs Katie Reed / Emily Cunningham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Curd / Ann Louden vs Wendy Croney / Marcy White6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Archibald / Lana Pierce vs Margaret Berzins / Kristen Corporon5-7, 6-7
2023-05-25vs CACM BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Curd / Stacy Burd vs Stephanie Mcgowan / Andrea Puschaver6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-18vs GCC TEALSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStacy Burd / Amy Curd vs Amy Manley / Diedre Wooden7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Lana Pierce vs Megan Ryall / Carol Thornock4-6, 3-6
2023-05-11vs LTFC ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Stacy Burd vs Julie Garside / Stacy Ford3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Margaret Wilson
published
Ann Louden
published 4
3.68
Melissa Klein
published
3.67
Stacy Burd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Amy Curd
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Ann Baldwin
published 4
3.39
Lana Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Martha Riley
published
Paula Archibald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Burd + Amy Curd3253% gamesnot enough data
Martha Riley + Lana Pierce033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Wilson
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Ann Louden
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Klein
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Stacy Burd
49W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Amy Curd
49W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Ann Baldwin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lana Pierce
72W–101L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
Martha Riley
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Paula Archibald
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.