Teams

Strung Out 8.5

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-03vs PTSA 8.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesPayton McGriff / Justin Endow vs Pratap Murali / Suzanna Murali6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawson Crow / Misaki Horikiri vs Emily Thomas / Cory Mecham6-1, 6-2
2026-09-01vs UntouchaballsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Finch / Karri Jones vs Ashlin Carlisle / Austin Wilkes3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesArianna Rose / Winfield Jones vs Tayler Henrie / Karen East2-6, 4-6
2026-08-27vs Simply SmashingLost 03
L#1 DoublesMisaki Horikiri / Winfield Jones vs Alex Wong / Sydney Crabtree2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Tesnohlidek / Dawson Crow vs Kevin Jay / Leslie Koppenhafer6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArianna Rose / Yusuke Suzuki vs Josh Johnson / Anya Sandusky3-6, 3-6
2026-08-25vs The HoundsLost 02
L#2 DoublesClarissa Cutler-Evans / Chris Christensen vs Christopher Phan / Anne Marie Carlisle3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarri Jones / Max Yount vs Kellee Bates / Stephen Heath6-7, 4-6
2026-08-20vs Serve Mix-A-LotLost 12
L#1 DoublesWinfield Jones / Arianna Rose vs Jake Cuttler / Robyn Roby2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTim Finch / Karri Jones vs Alexandra Hodson / Jeremy Sturdavant6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeremy Canning / Payton McGriff vs Jonas Griffel / Lori Griffel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Honey BadgersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMisaki Horikiri / Justin Endow vs Michelle Phillips / Chad Vincent7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve Mix-A-Lot2051546
2Strung Out 8.51133657
3The Hounds1133755
4PTSA 8.51124859

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Delaney Canning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Clarissa Cutler-Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Dylan Raymond
published 4.5
4.12
Emily Tesnohlidek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Alex Conilogue
published 4.5
4.11
Arianna Rose
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Payton McGriff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Justin Endow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Kelley Canning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Dawson Crow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Chris Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Jeremy Canning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Winfield Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Karri Jones
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Kristie Thompson
published
Max Yount
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Misaki Horikiri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Finch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Payton McGriff + Justin Endow7260% games+19.4% vs expected
Dylan Raymond + Payton McGriff10951% games+5.3% vs expected
Karri Jones + Winfield Jones341655% games+3.8% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Justin Endow5252% games−1.0% vs expected
Jeremy Canning + Delaney Canning1444% games−2.7% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Jeremy Canning21039% games−17.1% vs expected
Dylan Raymond + Kristie Thompson2644% gamesnot enough data
Dylan Raymond + Kelley Canning3453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Delaney Canning
42W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Clarissa Cutler-Evans
107W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Dylan Raymond
80W–65L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Emily Tesnohlidek
79W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alex Conilogue
36W–31L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Arianna Rose
4W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Payton McGriff
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Justin Endow
167W–107L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Kelley Canning
164W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Dawson Crow
55W–22L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Chris Christensen
61W–69L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jeremy Canning
164W–152L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Winfield Jones
182W–121L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Karri Jones
184W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Kristie Thompson
61W–64L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Max Yount
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Misaki Horikiri
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Finch
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.