Teams

Junior/LR/OC

2026 Mixed 40 & Over 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs Rumbach/Anderson/RebsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Peter Newey vs Lisa Breeding / Ryan Allmond5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Fletcher / Hope Rider vs Elly Rumbach / Ryan Oyos6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPablo Sanchez Soria / Eva Christina Artigue vs Eric Pinter / Lacey Watts3-6, 5-7
2026-07-22vs Sisoukrath/Benton/RebsLost 03
L#1 DoublesEva Christina Artigue / Keith Fletcher vs Julie Steel / Tay Sisoukrath3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Brown / Eric Baker vs Mary Thalheimer / Greg Jones4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHope Rider / Benjamin Rider vs Caroline Howse / Rodney Sullins2-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Sisco/LR/RebsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Eric Baker vs Milli Stanley / Jamey Sapp4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPablo Sanchez Soria / Elizabeth Cook vs Amy Lane / Nathan Bender0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Fletcher / Anita Junior vs Harold Specht / Erika Johnson3-6, 3-6
2026-07-01vs Sisco/LR/RebsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKeith Fletcher / Carrie Brown vs Erika Johnson / Harold Specht6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHope Rider / Benjamin Rider vs Charlie Roberts / Sarah Sisco3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Pablo Sanchez Soria vs Max Good / Amy Lane6-7, 6-7
2026-06-24vs Rumbach/Anderson/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Pablo Sanchez Soria vs Christine Althoff / Eric Pinter6-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Stone / Peter Newey vs Jennifer Simmons / Ryan Allmond3-6, 2-2
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Rider / Hope Rider vs Susan Altrui / Jarred Kibbey6-1, 6-3
2026-06-23vs Wittenberg/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Junior / Eric Baker vs Rachel Wayne / Brian Wayne6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Peter Newey vs Sarah Mathews / Bradley McColey4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDenise Allen-Duff / Keith Fletcher vs Lindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg7-6, 6-1
2026-06-18vs DGarretson/NLR/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Cook / Keith Fletcher vs DOUG GOLDEN / Deanna Garretson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Cheiko Stewart vs Sonjia Loftis / Kevin Golden3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Junior / Pablo Sanchez Soria vs Flora Lucia De La Garza Bayon / Andrew Vogler1-6, 5-7
2026-06-08vs Worley/Breaker/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Rider / Hope Rider vs Scott Wolf / Natalie Rockefeller5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheiko Stewart / Autumn Hemphill vs Dean Worley / Sydney Breaker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeith Fletcher / Elizabeth Cook vs Michael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rumbach/Anderson/Rebs5316822211
2Sisco/LR/Rebs53131125226
3Worley/Breaker/LR/Rebs44121224212
4Wittenberg/LR/PVCC3581635231
5Junior/LR/OC2681634251
6DGarretson/NLR/BP2691534243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Peter Newey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Autumn Hemphill
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Benjamin Rider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Eric Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Hope Rider
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Cheiko Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Anita Junior
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Eva Christina Artigue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Denise Allen-Duff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Keith Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.00
Pablo Sanchez Soria
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Elizabeth Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Rider + Hope Rider2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Newey
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Autumn Hemphill
20W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Benjamin Rider
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Eric Baker
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Hope Rider
16W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Cheiko Stewart
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Anita Junior
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Eva Christina Artigue
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Denise Allen-Duff
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Keith Fletcher
13W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Pablo Sanchez Soria
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Elizabeth Cook
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.