Teams

KPollak-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-09vs SFranks-ENOWon 20
W#2 SinglesButton Hall vs Sarah Franks3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Liz Chen6-2, 6-2
2025-06-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Elizabeth McNamara2-6, 0-6
2025-06-16vs Post-Rust/McGill-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Dayna Kelly3-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs HRoss-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Sindhu Shivaji3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesButton Hall vs Justyne Ross5-7, 1-6
2025-06-02vs CCouto-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Atsuko Duncan6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesButton Hall vs Pilneyo Seo6-2, 6-3
2025-05-29vs MLong-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Corinne Haywood6-1, 7-6
2025-05-05vs CYu2-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Jenna Schreiber1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Amber Cagle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Button Hall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Betsy Shane
published 4
3.41
Kathryn Pollak
published
Nichole Hatcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Silverstein + Betsy Shane123 matchesnot enough data
Amber Cagle + Button Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Cagle
216W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Betsy Shane
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Kathryn Pollak
4W–20L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Nichole Hatcher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.