Teams

SD 3.5WE Peninsula/ Gamara

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-19vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ IrvingWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Alicia Burnes vs Mer Chiodo / Michele Kelley6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-12vs SD 3.5WE Balboa Slammers/ EdwardsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesClaire Mittermiller vs Leah Christensen6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Shelly Patriquin vs Dinah Mattozzi / Carol Morris1-6, 1-6
2022-06-05vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ MonzonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Susan Schraeder vs Lorena Monzon / Rebecca Riley5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Patriquin / Claire Mittermiller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-22vs SD 3.5WE LJB&TC/ MichaelsenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Axmann / Amy Blum vs Janey Michaelsen / Sarah Suiter0-6, 0-6
2022-05-15vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ GarveyLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Schraeder / Lisa Gray vs Elizabeth Yu-Hansen / Gretchen Shaffer0-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs SD 3.5WE Coronado TC/ LeshWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Susan Schraeder vs Jessica Balli / Nabeelah Khan6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesClaire Mittermiller vs Michelle Gilmore6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Lisa Mallory vs Caree Lesh / Jennifer Vernallis6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Patriquin / Claire Mittermiller vs Brandy Baray / TOMOKO BALKO2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Alicia Burnes vs Dana Davalos / Sandra Lim6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Claire Mittermiller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.83
Kim Schwab
published 4
3.60
Patricia HOLMAN
published
3.52
Cherie Hibbs
published 4
3.47
Elizabeth McLean
published 3.5
3.42
Sarah Dudley
published
3.28
Shelly Patriquin
published
3.08
Alicia Burnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Lisa Serrano
published
2.93
Susan Schraeder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Karen Axmann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claire Mittermiller
81W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Kim Schwab
90W–31L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Patricia HOLMAN
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Cherie Hibbs
63W–41L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Elizabeth McLean
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sarah Dudley
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Shelly Patriquin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Alicia Burnes
33W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
Lisa Serrano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Susan Schraeder
64W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.