Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Vidovic)(CCC#2)

2022 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 2.5 ADULT WOMEN

3 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Alexa Meraz vs C H / Michelle Martinez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Kristina Miller vs Rosario Mendoza / Sandra Escalante6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAlexa Meraz vs Cristina da Costa7-6, 6-1
2022-05-25vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#3)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAlexa Meraz / Kristina Miller vs Michelle Jabor / Keithley Stanley3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSamantha Johnson vs Barbara Basurto7-6, 6-4
2022-05-14vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Overly)(EPCC#1))Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristina Miller / Samantha Johnson vs Danielle Adams / Karyna Vargas4-6, 2-6
2022-05-07vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristina Miller / Maggie Lindner vs Eufemia Garcia / Tiffany Joudi3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Johnson / Andrea Lopez vs Shannon Rhoads / Esther McCarthy0-6, 0-6
2022-04-30vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Kristina Miller vs Perla Carrillo / Roxanna Medina6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlexa Meraz vs Hazel Lozano2-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristina Miller / Maggie Lindner vs Fernanda Grattom / Georgina Garcia6-7, 3-6
2022-03-31vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W( Mayo)(CCC#1)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Kristina Miller vs Carolina Machado / Celine Mata6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlexa Meraz vs Monica Ramirez6-2, 6-3
2022-03-19vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#3)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Melissa Rogers vs Taryn Hunt / Michelle Jabor1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlexa Meraz vs Lluvia Bordier0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexa Meraz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Maggie Lindner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Johnson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexa Meraz + Maggie Lindner1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexa Meraz
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Lindner
13W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Samantha Johnson
19W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.