Teams

Metal Racquets

2022 Prince Georges Mixed 18 & Over · Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-02vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Vranas / Keenan Keeling vs Tam Banh / Nicole White6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Stratton / Jack Lavinder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Vranas / Keenan Keeling vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Kilberg / Ashten Rea vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-12vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesStacy Stratton / Jack Lavinder vs Demetrius Crawford / PAULA SMITH6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-05vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Vranas / Keenan Keeling vs Demetrius Crawford / Dannielle Freeman7-5, 6-4
2022-02-19vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVWon 20
W#1 DoublesMekkla Thompson / Jerome Lebleu vs Tynika Wilson / Yong Kim6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Roberts Nolan / Keenan Keeling vs Mia Piansay / Angel Fernandez6-4, 6-3
2022-02-13vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVLost 01
L#3 DoublesMekkla Thompson / Jerome Lebleu vs Bernadette Walker / Kevin Holston2-6, 4-6
2022-01-29vs 8.0 Mixed LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesJack Lavinder / Julie Chen vs Dannielle Freeman / Sean Conley3-6, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Stacy Stratton
published
3.94
Mekkla Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Jack Lavinder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Leslie Robins
published
3.62
Ashten Rea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Struther van Horn
published
3.60
3.32
Diem Salmon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Keenan Keeling
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jerome Lebleu
published
Jordan Zimmerman
published
Karthik Ramesh
published
Kirstyn Davidson
published
Michael Kilberg
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Stratton
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Mekkla Thompson
161W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Jack Lavinder
98W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Leslie Robins
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ashten Rea
143W–116L career · 1 line in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Struther van Horn
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Keitaro Nishimura
148W–63L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Diem Salmon
63W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Keenan Keeling
85W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Jerome Lebleu
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karthik Ramesh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirstyn Davidson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Kilberg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.