Teams

SRochkind-YMCA

2026 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-16vs DScruggs-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Wiesenhahn / Chelsea Avchen vs Karen Sonders / Rob McGarrah0-6, 1-6
2026-07-02vs RKumar-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesSareek Hosein / Katherine Beall vs Ed Slanker / Thi My Tho Rogers7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Suzanne Katzenstein vs Bingjie Li / Wenkai Yu6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-25vs JRussell-DFCWon 20
W#1 DoublesEleri Irish / Adam Williamson vs Brian Reo / Meta Kuehn7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChelsea Avchen / David Wiesenhahn vs Gwendolen Buhr / Kevin Kearns7-5, 7-5
2026-06-18vs AWu-TOCHLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Beall / Ken Eaton vs Carmelo Cataudella / Cheri Melone0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Avchen / Steven Rochkind vs Elizabeth Enderline / CHARLES ENDERLINE1-6, 0-6
2026-06-11vs SGraff-DURLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Beall / Ken Eaton vs Areli Grodski / Leon Grodski Barrera6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-28vs JYoung-DURWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Beall / Adam Williamson vs Courtney Carey / Okeith GREENE6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Adam Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Katherine Beall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Steven Rochkind
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
David Wiesenhahn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Jacquelyn Bartlett
published
2.41
Ken Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacquelyn Bartlett + Steven Rochkind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adam Williamson
11W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Katherine Beall
50W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Steven Rochkind
5W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
David Wiesenhahn
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jacquelyn Bartlett
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Ken Eaton
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.