Teams

Paulk/Centerton/IND

2025 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-16vs Bertram/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAshley Crouch vs Becca Bertram6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Cynthia Meullenet6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCarrie Beere vs Sherry Carpenter6-1, 6-3
2026-01-19vs King/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 SinglesAndrea Trout vs Jenna Donnell6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCarrie Beere vs Aysa Galbraith6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAngela Paulk vs April Rucker6-1
2026-01-13vs Geduldig/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAndrea Trout vs Samantha Thiede Erickson6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCarrie Beere vs Laura Phillips4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Christy Williams5-7, 6-5
2025-12-03vs Evans/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
L#1 SinglesAshley Crouch vs Martha Perez5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJeanalyn Le vs Jena Newman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-2, 6-2
2025-11-17vs Hanus/Rogers/PCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesAndrea Trout vs Dondi Sanders7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAshley Crouch vs Lisa Bores1-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesJeanalyn Le vs Marjorie Hanus6-7, 3-6
2025-11-06vs Wallace/Bella Vista/INDLost 12
L#1 SinglesCarrie Beere vs Annemarie Porter2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJeanalyn Le vs Sarah Pigo6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Sydney Flaig6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Andrea Trout
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Carrie Beere
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Angela Paulk
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.83
Ashley Crouch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Jeanalyn Le
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Beere + Andrea Trout303 matchesnot enough data
Angela Paulk + Jeanalyn Le213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Trout
42W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Carrie Beere
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Angela Paulk
28W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Ashley Crouch
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
Jeanalyn Le
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.