Teams

WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Becker

2023 WI Other · WI Tri Level Delta Doubles Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesDustin Dean / Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez vs Sameer Mathur / Michael MacLean6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Goetz / Carlos Marquez vs Marques Degrandis / John Gritt6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJames Dahl / Robert Goetz vs Jeffery Johnson / Jason Mann7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMiguel Garcia-Gosalvez / Timothy Juergens vs Christopher Cusack / Chase Peck4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDylan Oconnell / Stephen Schaak vs David Bussan / Timothy Nott2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesRobert Goetz / Carlos Marquez vs Arune Brekke / Kyle Browning6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Becker / Dustin Dean vs Lars Fiorio / Benjamin Bachmann5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Schaak / Daniel DeJarlais vs Daniel Jing / Asif Azhar0-6, 1-6
2023-12-04vs WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT ChenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Dahl / Carlos Marquez vs Nicholas Havlicek / Hai Nguyen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Becker / Timothy Juergens vs Jack Brody / Hongbo Chen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Gregor / Daniel DeJarlais vs Yepeng Jin / Scott Chen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-27vs WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT KimWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Goetz / Carlos Marquez vs Tarek Said / John Rice6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMiguel Garcia-Gosalvez / Timothy Juergens vs Young-Mook Lee / Jiho Kim4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDylan Oconnell / Michael Gregor vs Timur Mavlyutov / Zhicheng Jin4-6, 2-4
2023-11-16vs WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT PuttiLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Goetz / James Dahl vs Doy Kim / Jonathan Sandoval3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDustin Dean / Timothy Juergens vs Albert Men / David Kim3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Schaak / Daniel DeJarlais vs Krishne Gowda / Kumar Lakshminarayanan2-6, 3-6
2023-11-09vs WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT MiuraLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Dahl / Robert Goetz vs Majid Afshar / Adam Wise7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDustin Dean / Michael Becker vs Kai Bachmann / Edd Hellmer6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDylan Oconnell / Stephen Schaak vs Farid Masrour / Craig Nelson4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRobert Goetz / James Dahl vs Matthew Hoyer / Chris Isensee6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Becker / Dustin Dean vs Matthew Ulrich / Andrew Thooft6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WI Tri Level Delta Doubles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Misener8021310146
2WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Putti7119512150
3WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Kim5315921190
4WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Chen44111332252
5WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Becker35111327215
6WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Miura3591532230
7WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Parrish3591532235
8WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Isensee3591534237
9WI Tri Delta M Doubles MALT Vemuganti0842040249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Carlos Marquez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.65
James Dahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Dustin Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Timothy Juergens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Daniel DeJarlais
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Stephen Schaak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Dylan Oconnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Michael Becker
published
Michael Gregor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dustin Dean + Michael Becker11156% games+9.2% vs expected
Dustin Dean + Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez51048% games−0.6% vs expected
James Dahl + Robert Goetz3450% games−9.3% vs expected
Stephen Schaak + Michael Gregor4446% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Schaak + Dylan Oconnell2539% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez + Stephen Schaak4160% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Schaak + Timothy Juergens2340% gamesnot enough data
Robert Goetz + Michael Becker044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carlos Marquez
114W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4
James Dahl
106W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dustin Dean
58W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez
50W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Timothy Juergens
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Daniel DeJarlais
32W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
Stephen Schaak
52W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Dylan Oconnell
17W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Michael Becker
32W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Gregor
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Goetz
102W–82L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.