Teams

5-LKieffer-UNC

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-25vs 3-LWollman-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrienne Caranasos / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Deon Roach / Janis Tillman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-18vs 4-MLong-Eno 40 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLAURIE KIEFFER / Kelly Johnson vs Lisa Swank / Stacy Brehm6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-11vs 6-SSmith-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElston Miles / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Caroline Hamilton / Lauren Powell3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRebekah Farris / Rebecca Tomasini vs Stacey Smith / Elizabeth Everett2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Cidlowski / Lauren Zedek vs Aimee Poduri / Elizabeth Albright3-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs 3-LWollman-CHCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Willis / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Lawson Travers / Christy Bowman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Balog / Lauren Zedek vs Deon Roach / Janis Tillman3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-08-21vs 1-KHoekstra-HR 40 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Tomasini / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Jaime Parker / Barbie McGarrah6-3, 6-1
2023-08-14vs 2-KTravis-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Cidlowski / Rebecca Tomasini vs Millie Hunter / Katie Elder3-6, 4-6
2023-08-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesChris Jackson / Rebecca Tomasini vs Beth Clark / Stacy Brehm6-4, 6-4
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Jackson / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Mary Fortin / Abigail Hatcher0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Rebekah Farris
published
2.95
2.87
LAURIE KIEFFER
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.86
Lauren Zedek
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Rebecca Tomasini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LAURIE KIEFFER + Rebekah Farris3448% games−4.2% vs expected
LAURIE KIEFFER + Lauren Zedek2336% gamesnot enough data
LAURIE KIEFFER + Rebecca Tomasini224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebekah Farris
26W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Brienne Caranasos
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
LAURIE KIEFFER
70W–74L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Lauren Zedek
37W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Rebecca Tomasini
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.