Teams

Perry Combo 2.5 18 2025

2025 Decatur Southern Combo 18 and Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Estes / Shelley Hopkins vs Marianne Ashe / Laura Callahan6-1, 6-0
2025-10-06vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Split 11
L#1 DoublesLeah Marsh / Kenedey Smith vs Kathy Roeske / Belinda Rossi4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Estes / Shelley Hopkins vs Angie Cushing / Erika Huber7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-27vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Split 11
W#1 DoublesMarianne Huie / Melissa Kaiser vs Christina Caprio-smith / Kathy Roeske0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Hardy / Leah Marsh vs Gracie Nichols / Cathleen Rupp2-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kaiser / Debbie Bailie vs Kathy Roeske / Marianne Ashe6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Hopkins / Marianne Huie vs Debra Harvel / Belinda Rossi6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-10vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebbie Bailie / Cindy Perry vs Erika Huber / Angie Cushing3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCassidy McClellan / Melissa Estes vs Laura Callahan / Gracie Nichols6-2, 6-1
2025-09-04vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Estes / Debbie Bailie vs Debra Harvel / Angie Cushing6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Perry / Gail Roberts vs Belinda Rossi / Cathleen Rupp6-0, 6-1
2025-08-23vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Hardy / Cassidy McClellan vs Marianne Ashe / Laura Callahan6-1, 6-2
2025-08-09vs Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Perry / Shelley Hopkins vs Kathy Roeske / Angie Cushing7-6, 3-1
W#2 DoublesClaire Broussard / Melissa Estes vs Marianne Ashe / Serena Neely6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Shelley Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Gail Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.35
Melissa Estes
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.34
Debbie Bailie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Melissa Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cassidy McClellan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.22
Kenedey Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Claire Broussard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Cindy Perry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Marianne Huie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.03
Leah Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Perry + Gail Roberts5259% games+10.4% vs expected
Debbie Bailie + Marianne Huie4249% games+3.0% vs expected
Debbie Bailie + Melissa Estes8256% games+2.4% vs expected
Cindy Perry + Marianne Huie7945% games+2.4% vs expected
Debbie Bailie + Cindy Perry2538% games−4.2% vs expected
Marianne Huie + Melissa Estes224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Estes + Claire Broussard224 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Huie + Shelley Hopkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelley Hopkins
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Gail Roberts
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Melissa Estes
25W–28L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Debbie Bailie
35W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Melissa Kaiser
37W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Cassidy McClellan
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenedey Smith
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Claire Broussard
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cindy Perry
23W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Marianne Huie
22W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Leah Marsh
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.