Teams

IRMSL/Hazelton/COMBO18&Over7.5W

2023 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-06Split 11
L#2 DoublesRachael McLaurin / Leslie London vs Ann Chauss / Alexandra Chauss6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnita Venner / Cynthia Croom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesRachael McLaurin / Leslie London vs Mara Puerner / Wendy Coya6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarta Gannon / Cynthia Croom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-08vs NRS - KendallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKate Simpson / Cynthia Croom vs Karen Higgins / Grace Pillari7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie London / Rachael McLaurin vs Ann Chauss / Alexandra Chauss3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-11-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Kate Simpson vs Wendy Coya / Mara Puerner6-3, 6-0
2023-10-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesMiley Cyr / Cynthia Croom vs Alexa Garrido Dupuis / Andrea Lombardi6-2, 6-0
2023-09-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesRachael McLaurin / Leslie London vs Ann Chauss / Alexandra Chauss6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Muren
published 4
3.70
Kate Simpson
published
3.65
Rachael McLaurin
published
3.62
Leslie London
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Anita Venner
published 4
3.36
Sara Lloyd
published
3.33
Cynthia Croom
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristin Hazelton
published
Katie Winslow
published
Marta Gannon
published
Sue Davis
published
Tara Ramsey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Muren
131W–66L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Simpson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.70
Rachael McLaurin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Leslie London
47W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Anita Venner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sara Lloyd
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Kristin Hazelton
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Katie Winslow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marta Gannon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Ramsey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.