Teams

CED:Cedardale:Umar

2023 EMA Tri Level · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.83 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-19vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Loosian / Joseph Walsh vs Scott Burnham / Joshua Judge3-6, 5-7
2023-12-18vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBalraj Dard / Daniel Downs vs Scott Burnham / Joshua Judge1-6, 1-6
2023-12-13vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBalraj Dard / Khalid Umar vs Brad Riley / Joshua Judge1-6, 3-6
2023-12-09vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Loosian / Joseph Walsh vs Matthew Ames / Joshua Judge3-6, 0-6
2023-11-30vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Walsh / Balraj Dard vs Matthew Ames / UGO ARLORO2-6, 3-6
2023-11-24vs CED:Cedardale:AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Downs / Derek Loosian vs UGO ARLORO / Brad Riley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CED:Cedardale:Ames6060130
2CED:Cedardale:Umar06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Derek Loosian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Daniel Downs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Balraj Dard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Joseph Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Khalid Umar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Downs + Balraj Dard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Derek Loosian
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Daniel Downs
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Balraj Dard
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Walsh
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Khalid Umar
16W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.