Teams

SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ Schroeder

2024 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-05vs SDNC 7.0 Meridian (2:1)/ HubbardWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaysoon Aziz / Rita Murphy vs Heidi Ulrich / Debra Schade3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTatiana Bourd / Bunny Shin vs Gracie Jones / Shirley Sek6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-23vs SDNC 7.0 RBCTC/ CahanLost 01
L#1 DoublesBunny Shin / Debby Latterich vs Julie Read / Judy Cahan5-7, 2-6
2024-07-16vs SDNC 7.0 KCP/ Yao-GarciaLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaysoon Aziz / Bunny Shin vs Dianna Yao-Garcia / Cathleen Rawson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRita Murphy / Bunny Shin vs Kiersten Bousquet / Caresse Muir2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSabine Schroeder / Norma Garrison vs Lisa McDonald / Karen Rose1-6, 3-6
2024-06-04vs SDNC LLW 7.0 RSFTC/ OrtelLost 02
L#2 DoublesSabine Schroeder / Norma Garrison vs Carlie Pasha Berke / Diana Clark3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRita Murphy / Maysoon Aziz vs Jill Ruzich / Birgitte Bradshaw4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deborah Parks
published 4
3.48
Jeri Edelen
published 4
3.17
Terri Oates
published
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
3.05
Maysoon Aziz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Rita Murphy
published
2.90
Bunny Shin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.75
Beth Levine
published 3
2.72
Sabine Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
Tatiana Bourd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabine Schroeder + Beth Levine5349% games+3.8% vs expected
Sabine Schroeder + Bunny Shin6550% games−4.4% vs expected
Sabine Schroeder + Rita Murphy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deborah Parks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jeri Edelen
18W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Terri Oates
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Maysoon Aziz
21W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
Rita Murphy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Bunny Shin
40W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Beth Levine
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Sabine Schroeder
40W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
Tatiana Bourd
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.