Teams

Red Hots

2023 USTA Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 - MIXED 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-24vs Wyoming/Gill/40&Over7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Fechtmeister / Cindy Schultz vs Lon Huston / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Dockstader / Laurie Hill vs TERRY RHONE / Rene Williams7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBruce Adams / Marian Grandbois vs John Masters / Ginger Paige4-6, 1-6
2023-06-24vs Wyoming/Gill/40&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Fechtmeister / Cindy Schultz vs Gregory Boughton / Priscilla Gill3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Dockstader / Laurie Hill vs Lon Huston / Rene Williams5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Adams / Marian Grandbois vs TERRY RHONE / Ginger Paige2-6, 5-7
2023-06-23vs Wyoming/Gill/40&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Fechtmeister / Cindy Schultz vs John Masters / Shay Howlin7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Dockstader / Laurie Hill vs Gregory Boughton / Priscilla Gill3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Adams / Marian Grandbois vs TERRY RHONE / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo2-6, 1-6
2023-06-23vs Wyoming/Gill/40&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Fechtmeister / Cindy Schultz vs Gregory Boughton / Priscilla Gill4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesThomas Dockstader / Laurie Hill vs John Masters / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Adams / Marian Grandbois vs Lon Huston / Shay Howlin3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 - MIXED 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carol Adams
published 3
2.63
Laurie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bruce Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marian Grandbois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Fechtmeister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Dockstader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Adams + Marian Grandbois044 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Hill + Thomas Dockstader134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Schultz + Paul Fechtmeister134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Schultz
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carol Adams
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Hill
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.63
Bruce Adams
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marian Grandbois
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Fechtmeister
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Dockstader
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.