Teams

DH-Thompson

2026 Adult 40 & Over-GC · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-12vs Levy - Martin/WilkinsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Donald Geier vs Jeremy Tapper / Wes Steiner1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSheldon Zhang vs Johnny Still4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Thompson / Shannon Hailes vs David Ryan / Dean Doty4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCultus Pearson / Reuben Byrd vs Kevin Martin / Jason Brannon2-6, 2-6
2026-05-05vs Hutch BBTC 40 and OverLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonald Geier / Rock Rowell vs Dana Ladnier / Ryan Canon4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSheldon Zhang vs Johnny Hisaw6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCultus Pearson / Peter Yednorowicz vs Renaldo Jordan / William Hasty2-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs Levy - Martin/WilkinsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Rock Rowell vs Jeff LeBlanc / Anthony Nguyen0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSheldon Zhang vs Johnny Still6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPhil Schmidt / Donald Geier vs Jeremy Tapper / Wes Steiner6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCultus Pearson / Shannon Hailes vs David Ryan / Dean Doty3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-08vs Levy - Martin/WilkinsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Thompson / Phil Schmidt vs Jason Brannon / Wade Hardy2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Yednorowicz vs Wes Steiner1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Rock Rowell vs Bryan Hall / Jeff LeBlanc6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCultus Pearson / Shannon Hailes vs Kevin Martin / Dean Doty2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Sheldon Zhang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Donald Geier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Rock Rowell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Shannon Hailes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Phil Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Cultus Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.18
Reuben Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Peter Yednorowicz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Hailes + Cultus Pearson4746% games−8.3% vs expected
Donald Geier + Rock Rowell314 matchesnot enough data
Rock Rowell + Cultus Pearson134 matchesnot enough data
Cultus Pearson + Reuben Byrd044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheldon Zhang
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Donald Geier
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Rock Rowell
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Shannon Hailes
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Phil Schmidt
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Cultus Pearson
9W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
Reuben Byrd
52W–112L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Peter Yednorowicz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.