Teams

VTolson (Firethorne)

2023 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-26vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Anna Sison6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Brittany Baker6-1, 6-2
2023-07-19vs KCurley (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Suzanne Austin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-12vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Melissa Leisure2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Virginia Katzen4-6, 2-6
2023-07-05vs KMacrone (BCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Kate MacRone6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Michelle Silla6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Amy Combs6-1, 6-0
2023-06-28vs KDay (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesViki Tolson vs Angie Mehrizi6-2, 7-5
2023-06-28vs TAmos/VSofarelli (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Martha Lowman6-2, 6-1
2023-06-19vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesViki Tolson vs Brittany Baker4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTARA RAND vs Holly Meloy6-4, 6-1
2023-05-31vs KCurley (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Mindy Zimmerman6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
TARA RAND
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Julianne Gray
published
2.87
Jennifer Voci
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Wendy Hall
published
2.81
Danielle Shealy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer Pollino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Jennifer McCoy
published
2.66
Viki Tolson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer McCoy + Julianne Gray8453% games+5.7% vs expected
Danielle Shealy + TARA RAND5358% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Voci + TARA RAND5355% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Shealy + Jennifer Voci3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
TARA RAND
86W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Julianne Gray
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Jennifer Voci
96W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Wendy Hall
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.86
3
Danielle Shealy
91W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Jennifer Pollino
83W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Jennifer McCoy
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Viki Tolson
25W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.