← Teams

THPRD-Baran//Harrigan

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
—
Joseph Didner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Patrick Harkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Karen Dellinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Lily Looi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results8 ties
2021-11-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Rebecca Yu / Shane Wilson7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDeepak Kumar / Rie Sasakawa vs William Creger / Ellen Mader4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Didner / Karen Dellinger vs Ke Ounaphom / Megan McCarter6-1
2021-11-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoseph Didner / Angie Lee vs Sankavi Subbiah / Son Huynh6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Lily Looi vs Kristin Taylor / Kyle Cavelti6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Brian Hughes / Lindsey Kahler7-6, 6-2
2021-11-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Lily Looi vs Jennie Brawn / Rudd McGarity7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoseph Didner / Flor Harrigan vs Tony Moreno / Tami McAra5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-30Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / William Wang vs Stephanie Jones / Michael Kazangian5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Neil Soiffer vs Pamela Meiling / Kevin Muck6-2, 6-4
2021-10-23Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Joseph Didner vs Maureen Harwood / Shawn Boyce6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Vivian Nguyen vs Julie Hansen / Eric Means3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Neil Soiffer vs Bryan Gonzalvo / Diane di Vito6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Lily Looi vs Amanda Solomon / Arun Vijayakumar5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Deepak Kumar vs Sarah Ferrer / Kevin Jarvis6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoseph Didner / Rie Sasakawa vs Ellen Mader / Shane Wilson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-09-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Patrick Harkin vs Robby Lafleur / Kevin Heller6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Deepak Kumar vs Natalie Nicholson / Sushil Srivastava6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Didner / Flor Harrigan vs Kerstin Anderson / Neville Mehta6-1, 6-4
2021-09-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAngie Lee / Neil Soiffer vs Mark Chen / Jennifer Tran6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Vivian Nguyen vs Amanda Jensen / Wiley Zhao6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWilliam Wang / Karen Dellinger vs Truc Tran / Sammy Bui6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
62W–56L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4
Joseph Didner
8W–8L career · type T
not enough data
—
4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
—
4
Karen Dellinger
141W–68L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36
4
Lily Looi
77W–80L career
85%15%0%
3.31

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.