Teams

Royal Palm- Pyatt

2023 Miami-Dade Social South Florida Women's Double Tennis L · B-1

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-11vs Deering Bay - PorterLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLinda James / Marcy Goldstein vs Sara Klein / Ivory Shevin6-7, 1-6
2023-04-18vs Coral Pine- PicardLost 01
L#6 Female DoublesMarcy Goldstein / Linda James vs AnaElena Multach / Gloria Suarez-Sanchez5-7, 4-6
2023-03-07Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesChau Pyatt / Patricia Carroll-Tzakis vs Kathleen Simko / Tati Katz6-2, 6-1
2023-02-21vs TeamFormanLost 01
L#4 Female DoublesMilly Burke / Linda James vs Jessica Patino / Amy Tolman3-6, 1-6
2023-02-07Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesLinda James / Nancy Eklund vs Charlotte Marthinsson / Ana Romero Nunez1-6, 0-6
2022-12-13vs Key Bisayne (KBTA) - ArizmendyLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesChau Pyatt / Patricia Carroll-Tzakis vs Carolina Backes / Gisell Stella3-6, 5-7
2022-11-29Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesChau Pyatt / Patricia Carroll-Tzakis vs Lisa James / Jana Hertz6-0, 6-1
2022-11-01Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLinda James / Celeste Miller vs Adrianne Mittentag / Claudia van Essen0-6, 4-6
2022-10-18vs TeamFormanLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesSharon Goodwin / Linda James vs Jessica Arnesen / Sylvia Volkova1-6, 4-6
2022-10-04Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesPamela Thomas / Linda James vs Rhonda MacAu / Monica Brambilla2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for B-1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Natalie Carlos
published
2.92
Vivian Vila
usually #6 Female Doubles 46%, also #5 Female Doubles 18% · published
2.91
2.87
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
usually #1 Female Doubles 37%, also #6 Female Doubles 37% · published 3
2.82
Linda James
usually #2 Female Doubles 43%, also #3 Female Doubles 29% · published
Chau Pyatt
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Debbie Downey
published 3
2.50
Esther Copeland
published
2.44
Aleen Sirgany
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vivian Vila + Patricia Carroll-Tzakis7174% gamesnot enough data
Chau Pyatt + Patricia Carroll-Tzakis2451% gamesnot enough data
Vivian Vila + Chau Pyatt134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Carlos
1W–20L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Vivian Vila
43W–105L career · 10 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Sophia Ponomarenko
6W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
197W–132L career · 18 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Linda James
10W–38L career · 7 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Chau Pyatt
12W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Debbie Downey
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Esther Copeland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Aleen Sirgany
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.