Teams

Reefe

2021 Frederick County Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Shipley / Monica DeAgostino vs STACEY WOLFE / Nicole Goodwin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-08vs DeGioiaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Michelle Shipley vs Hilary Broder / Rebecca DeGioia6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristine Hawk / Monica DeAgostino vs Dominique Davis / Jessica Berkline5-7, 2-6
2021-06-06Won 20
W#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Kathy Greene vs Patti Cooper / Julie Baker6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMonica DeAgostino / Cathy Cunningham vs Cinda Toms / Michele Hansen6-2, 6-3
2021-06-03vs DickersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica DeAgostino / Christine Hawk vs Debbie Culler / Faye Meyers7-6, 6-2
2021-05-23vs DeGioiaLost 01
L#1 SinglesTeresa Reefe vs Jodi Hathaway7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesMonica DeAgostino / Veronica Best vs Michele Hansen / Anja Abbott6-2, 6-4
2021-05-17vs DickersonWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristen Hostler / Monica DeAgostino vs April Wick / Robin Dickerson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Stacie King vs Faye Meyers / Christina Widener7-6, 6-0
2021-05-14vs DeGioiaLost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Monica DeAgostino vs Jodi Hathaway / Hilary Broder4-6, 4-6
2021-05-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMonica DeAgostino / Kristen Hostler vs Robin Dickerson / Debbie Nolasco6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-30vs DeGioiaWon 10
W#2 DoublesVeronica Best / Teresa Reefe vs Michelle Karl / Erika Gilbert7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Teresa Reefe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.96
Kristy Sullivan
published
2.92
Kathy Greene
published
2.85
Lesley Leonard
published
2.84
Kristen Hostler
published
2.77
Monica DeAgostino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.65
Cathy Cunningham
published 3
Stacie King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Reefe + Monica DeAgostino72343% games−3.9% vs expected
Kristy Sullivan + Lesley Leonard314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Jones + Kathy Greene213 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Reefe + Lesley Leonard303 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Hostler + Lesley Leonard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Teresa Reefe
144W–118L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kristy Sullivan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kathy Greene
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Lesley Leonard
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
Kristen Hostler
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Monica DeAgostino
77W–123L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cathy Cunningham
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Stacie King
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.