Teams

Sh.Littleton40C

2026 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.65 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs St.Luther40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesShannon Littleton / Angela Teasdale vs Molly Briggs / Laura Cox6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Wynia / Jennifer Kuzma vs Kim Peters / Stephanie Luther6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Dougherty / Erin McAllister vs Korri Styers / Fran Ange6-0, 6-1
2026-08-19vs Ti.Barrier40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesAulia Tandradinata / Erin McAllister vs Rachael Yelverton / Elizabeth Newton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Teasdale / Shannon Littleton vs Lowry Liggon / Jenny Eskildsen7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Wynia / Amy Hobbs vs Tiffany Barrier / Mary-Peyton Amburn4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Sa.Wood40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kuzma / Julie Dougherty vs Amber Cagle / Daphne Poulk3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Bentley / Karen Hepp vs Barbara Timinskas / Lori Jensen3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Holly Atkinson vs Diane Sauer / Tobi Buckley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-05vs Ki.Patrey40C7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Angela Teasdale vs Deb Lanier / Sarah Ganong7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Hobbs / Erin McAllister vs Emily Johnson / Miho Ogura6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kuzma / Joanne Kearney vs Carrie Russell / Kimberly Patrey7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ke.Townsend40C3081456
2Ma.Gonella40C3081454
3Je.Holloman40C3072453
4As.Burch40C3063983
5Al.DeMacy40C2163673
6Ra.Mills40C2163983
7Sh.Littleton40C2163989
8Me.Liner40C2154978
9La.Capps40C1133650
10De.Turner40C1133657
11Al.Sheehan40C1133757
12Ti.Barrier40C12451075
13St.Luther40C12451082
14Sa.Wood40C12451188
15Ki.Patrey40C7.512361290
16Su.Knowles40C0112530
17El.Easley40C0103636
18He.Brewer40C0103636
19St.Rabby40C03271496
20Ve.Glass40C031817107
21Ca.Brawner40C031817108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Erin McAllister
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Angela Teasdale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
3.63
Anna Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Julie Dougherty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Amy Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Shannon Littleton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Alison Kalinowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Aulia Tandradinata
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Joanne Kearney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Holly Atkinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin McAllister + Amy Hobbs9263% games+9.3% vs expected
Erin Wynia + Amy Hobbs7061% games+3.8% vs expected
Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty11857% games+3.0% vs expected
Shannon Littleton + Aulia Tandradinata404 matchesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Aulia Tandradinata314 matchesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dougherty + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Erin Wynia + Joanne Kearney224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin McAllister
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Angela Teasdale
43W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
90W–127L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Anna Bentley
13W–22L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Julie Dougherty
46W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Amy Hobbs
52W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Shannon Littleton
34W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–126L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Aulia Tandradinata
283W–128L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Joanne Kearney
269W–160L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Holly Atkinson
252W–179L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.