Teams

SFV - Trial & Error

2024 Mixed Tri-Level 18+ SFV Fall · SFV Mid Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-24vs SFV - Pure DriveSplit 11
L#1 DoublesOlivia Burtis / David Lubnow vs Maurice Lacson / Donna Hoppe6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesOla Heum / Margie Englis vs Mel Matibag / Tracy HASBANIAN7-5, 6-3
2024-11-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargie Englis / Hayk Ghulijanyan vs William Hird / Ani Aghajanian6-2, 7-5
2024-11-10vs SFV - Scholland GarrosLost 01
L#3 DoublesMargie Englis / Hayk Ghulijanyan vs Hyo Jung Kim / Yeonhak Jung3-6, 1-6
2024-11-03vs SFV - Deuce BustersLost 01
L#3 DoublesOla Heum / Margie Englis vs Hrag Kopooshian / Andrea Fruits5-7, 6-7
2024-09-29vs SFV LLW - Smash & Dash - Dan LulaWon 10
W#3 DoublesOla Heum / Margie Englis vs Cindy Larson / Roman Kuperman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Mid Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Giancarlo Bertumen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Sara Heum
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.84
Olivia Burtis
published
3.72
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.58
Hayk Ghulijanyan
published
3.53
Tom Pudpai
published
3.50
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.39
David Lubnow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Ola Heum
published
Alicia Duran
published 3.5
3.22
Sergio Martinez
published
3.12
Mark Gasper
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Giancarlo Bertumen
129W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Sara Heum
122W–69L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
Olivia Burtis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.84
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alessandra Jara del Castillo
34W–20L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Hayk Ghulijanyan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tom Pudpai
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
David Lubnow
73W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Ola Heum
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Alicia Duran
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sergio Martinez
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.