Teams

GYB

2024 Mixed 18 and Over League · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-25vs Let’s go exerciseLost 12
W#1 DoublesTarek Farid / Harumi Inoue vs Julia Ito Chong / Courtney Young6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Mukai / Mena Ghbrial vs Dean Yamamoto / Miriam Healy1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMinako Shuster / Shinichiro Inoue. vs Karen Yamaguchi / Raymond Nishimiya3-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs Cuddle ClanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMinako Taniguchi / Shinichiro Inoue. vs Richard Ho / Xiaofei Mai6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Umaki / Harumi Inoue vs Kevin Doan / Man Ian Woo4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesReid Fukuya / Tina Mukai vs Winton Young / Lexi Mitsunaga1-6, 3-6
2024-02-11vs MD High FlyersLost 12
L#1 DoublesHarumi Inoue / Massimo Silivestro vs Kathy Kaneshige / Jayson Chan1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Stanley / Shinichiro Inoue. vs Jo Ann Hirata / Phillip Braiotta6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Reid Fukuya vs Jenny Son / Jilbert Salamanca3-6, 4-6
2024-02-04vs RD AgainLost 12
W#1 DoublesTarek Farid / Amber Stanley vs Alyssa Watanabe / Cameron Wong1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMassimo Silivestro / Yoko Naka vs Holly Sung / Bryan Lum2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Doe / Minako Shuster vs Andrea Neal / Kristopher Li5-7, 3-6
2024-01-31vs Aloha TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesTarek Farid / Amber Stanley vs Lori Fujimori / Eric Burns6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesReid Fukuya / Tomoko L Hirano vs Todd Fujimori / Nicole DeWitt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Doe / Yoko Naka vs Ronda Sagara / Wayne Goo6-0, 6-2
2024-01-21vs Super FriendsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMena Ghbrial / Minako Taniguchi vs Matthew Inouye / Christina Mello6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMassimo Silivestro / Tina Mukai vs Alvin Hirata / Yoko Casados2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Chen / Minako Shuster vs Terence Leong / Renee Jorg2-6, 2-6
2024-01-14vs Super Mariko Brothers (SMB)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMena Ghbrial / Tomoko L Hirano vs Remii Tanaka / SEALINA MAFNAS6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Umaki / Minako Taniguchi vs Justin Lui-Kwan / Atsuko Sato6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Chen / Tina Mukai vs Naoto Miyazaki / Mariko Horikawa0-6, 1-6
2024-01-07vs Scrambled LegsWon 21
L#1 DoublesShinichiro Inoue. / Tomoko L Hirano vs Ken Shimizu / Jennifer Alexander7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Umaki / Harumi Inoue vs Terence Waclawik / Erin Sandon6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Chen / Yoko Naka vs Alan Cheung / Dionne Kahale-Sirp6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Amber Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.56
Tomoko L Hirano
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Paul Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Reid Fukuya
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.14
Yoko Naka
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Minako Taniguchi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Harumi Inoue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kunal Parekh
published
Massimo Silivestro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mena Ghbrial
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Umaki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Minako Shuster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shinichiro Inoue.
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tarek Farid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Mukai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Stanley + Tarek Farid5256% gamesnot enough data
Paul Chen + Tina Mukai224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Chen + Minako Shuster213 matchesnot enough data
Paul Chen + Tomoko L Hirano213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Umaki + Minako Taniguchi213 matchesnot enough data
Reid Fukuya + Tomoko L Hirano123 matchesnot enough data
Massimo Silivestro + Tomoko L Hirano213 matchesnot enough data
Harumi Inoue + Shinichiro Inoue.303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Stanley
10W–24L career · type M · 8 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Tomoko L Hirano
85W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Paul Chen
64W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Reid Fukuya
35W–33L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Yoko Naka
42W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Minako Taniguchi
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.08
Harumi Inoue
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kunal Parekh
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Massimo Silivestro
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mena Ghbrial
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Umaki
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Minako Shuster
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shinichiro Inoue.
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tarek Farid
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Mukai
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.