Teams

2-MHanauer-Eno

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-24Won 10
W#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Jonathan Zhou6-1, 6-1
2023-07-14vs 1-JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesJeron Russell vs Abhi Bhirud2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Ryan Lewis3-6, 1-6
2023-07-12vs 1-JByrd-EnoLost 12
W#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Abhi Bhirud6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Richard Papantonis3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Gaurav Luther2-6, 4-6
2023-06-28Won 20
W#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Telmo Llanga6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Jonathan Zhou6-2, 6-2
2023-06-21vs 1-JByrd-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesMatthew James vs Richard Papantonis2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Peter Hull1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Brett Eckles4-6, 2-6
2023-06-09Split 11
W#1 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Jonathan Zhou6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew James vs Charles Beauchamp1-6, 4-6
2023-06-07Won 20
W#1 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Charles Beauchamp6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Jonathan Zhou6-2, 6-1
2023-05-31vs 1-JByrd-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Ryan Lewis1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Brett Eckles3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Curtis Lawson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Matthew James
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.01
Luc Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Jeron Russell
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.87
Joaquin Peralta
published
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeron Russell + Jackson Cabell161849% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Matthew James
67W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Luc Sanchez
26W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Jeron Russell
142W–90L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Joaquin Peralta
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.