Teams

WTF Again

2021 Tri-Level Men · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-01-09vs Hudson AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Clint Tomlinson vs Debasish Chakraborty / Manish Malevar7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeepak Amin / ILDEFONSO ACOSTA vs Jeremy Erber / David Gallet3-6, 1-6
2020-11-23vs NJ: Big BangWon 21
L#1 DoublesClint Tomlinson / John Chalerm vs Bill Kim / John Moon6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdmund Corvelli / Matthew Crawford vs Edgar Cala / Paul Park6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOgnjen Strbanovic / Brian Osborne vs Virgil Vladescu / John Yoon Kim4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-11-14vs Tri-HackersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoey Chui / Clint Tomlinson vs Robert Clauss / Peter Ortiz6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Gross / Edmund Corvelli vs Steven van Praagh / Govindaraj Balakrishnan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2020-11-07vs Hudson AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBen Ryu / Clint Tomlinson vs Will Coston / Daniel Plotnick1-6, 1-6
2020-10-31vs NJ: Big BangLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Joey Chui vs John Moon / James Ong2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEdmund Corvelli / Bruce Pople vs Stephan Kim / Edgar Cala6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Osborne / Ognjen Strbanovic vs John Yoon Kim / Jack Woo6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2020-10-24vs Tri-HackersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Clint Tomlinson vs Peter Ortiz / Anthony Lizares4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesILDEFONSO ACOSTA / Ognjen Strbanovic vs Mehran Mehrnia / Srba Nikolic6-3, 7-6
2020-10-17vs Hudson AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Ben Ryu vs Manish Malevar / Daniel Plotnick3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrian Osborne / ILDEFONSO ACOSTA vs Jeremy Erber / Jeffrey Massaro6-1, 6-3
2020-10-11vs NJ: Big BangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Joey Chui vs Michael Huh / Patrick Hsu7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Osborne / Deepak Amin vs John Yoon Kim / Jack Woo2-6, 1-6
2020-10-03vs Tri-HackersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Ben Ryu vs Peter Ortiz / Robert Clauss3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Osborne / Deepak Amin vs Srba Nikolic / Mehran Mehrnia6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Big Bang6319820210
2Tri-Hackers45111636272
3WTF Again27101739268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Edmund Corvelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Clint Tomlinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Matthew Crawford
published
3.14
Brian Osborne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
ILDEFONSO ACOSTA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Chalerm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clint Tomlinson + Edmund Corvelli5168% gamesnot enough data
John Chalerm + Clint Tomlinson224 matchesnot enough data
Clint Tomlinson + Brian Osborne044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edmund Corvelli
30W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Clint Tomlinson
192W–174L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Matthew Crawford
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Brian Osborne
21W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
ILDEFONSO ACOSTA
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Chalerm
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.