Teams

Chance 7.5 Combo 55s Mon

2023 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · Women 7.5 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-09vs Majestic 7.5 Combo 55s Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Hendricks / Libby Strickland vs Sheri Cram / Cary Scully6-3, 6-3
2023-10-02vs Susong/Beshears 7.5 Combo 55s MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Aikens / Libby Strickland vs Mary Fowler / Jean Eagan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-25vs Berreth 7.5 Combo 55s MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Eaton / Libby Strickland vs Jacqueline Bell / Kathy Brown7-5, 6-1
2023-09-18vs Majestic 7.5 Combo 55s Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Kathryn Michaud vs Tonya Lomas / Karyn Efird6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-11vs Susong/Beshears 7.5 Combo 55s MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Missy Chance vs Jean Eagan / Jean Schmid6-3, 6-4
2023-08-21vs Majestic 7.5 Combo 55s Mon PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesLibby Strickland / Susan Calkins vs Marian Hogan / Lynne Murray6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-20vs Berreth 7.5 Combo 55s MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Kathryn Michaud vs Sallye Parker / Marsha Tice6-2, 6-3
2023-08-14vs Susong/Beshears 7.5 Combo 55s MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Missy Chance vs Anne Thornton / Amy Leonard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.31
Martha Cox
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.25
Susan Calkins
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
3.25
Pamela Aikens
published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published 3.5
3.11
Vickie Degges
published
2.98
Darci Gold
published 3.5
2.89
Missy Chance
published
2.86
Beverly Burke
published 3
Jennie Pekarne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Aikens + Jaime Hendricks123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 8 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.31
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Susan Calkins
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Kincaid
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jaime Hendricks
13W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Vickie Degges
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darci Gold
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Beverly Burke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jennie Pekarne
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.