Teams

A18 4.0W WR Gossett

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Summer

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-08vs NEO/White/A18/4.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaterina Petty / Courtney Foster vs Michelle Simmons / Kay McHolm6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth van Dyke / Elyssa Schwartz vs Molly White / Jane Pukys6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLily Gossett / Arminda Parker vs Madison Altman / Renee Weaver4-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs A18 4.0W SP1 EffingerWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaterina Petty / Courtney Foster vs Elizabeth DeLuca / Ellie Effinger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth van Dyke / Elyssa Schwartz vs Amy Gray / Colleen Joyce6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesArminda Parker / Kiyomi Fukamachi vs Jennifer Kirchner / Lisa Sharp6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-03vs NEO/White/A18/4.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Gillen / Caterina Petty vs Ally Murphy / Michelle Simmons0-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth van Dyke / Elyssa Schwartz vs Ashley Gastin / MacKenzie Cavalier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLily Gossett / Kelle DeBoth vs Renee Weaver / Jane Pukys3-6, 1-6
2025-05-20vs A18 4.0W SP1 EffingerLost 14
L#1 DoublesAngela Lewis / Courtney Foster vs Ellie Effinger / Elizabeth DeLuca1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKari Gillen vs Gina Costanzo6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Jokhio / Caterina Petty vs MAGGIE GRAY / Jennifer Kirchner6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelle DeBoth vs Julie Trende5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLily Gossett / Elyssa Schwartz vs Christine Brucken / Colleen Joyce3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elyssa Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Kari Gillen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.67
Elizabeth van Dyke
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.66
Miki Nakamoto
published
3.56
Beth Jokhio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Caterina Petty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Courtney Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Arminda Parker
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Kiyomi Fukamachi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.30
Kelle DeBoth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Beth Schwartz
published 3.5
3.24
Lily Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Sophie Uijtewaal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miki Nakamoto + Caterina Petty4449% games+5.9% vs expected
Kelle DeBoth + Beth Jokhio4255% games+4.6% vs expected
Courtney Foster + Miki Nakamoto6353% games+3.2% vs expected
Kelle DeBoth + Kiyomi Fukamachi3446% games+1.1% vs expected
Caterina Petty + Kelle DeBoth4349% games−4.3% vs expected
Caterina Petty + Kari Gillen8551% games−5.1% vs expected
Courtney Foster + Caterina Petty10749% games−6.0% vs expected
Beth Jokhio + Kiyomi Fukamachi3450% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elyssa Schwartz
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kari Gillen
70W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elizabeth van Dyke
25W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Miki Nakamoto
32W–42L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Beth Jokhio
105W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Caterina Petty
121W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Courtney Foster
115W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Arminda Parker
109W–114L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kiyomi Fukamachi
41W–63L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kelle DeBoth
138W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Beth Schwartz
43W–45L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lily Gossett
41W–35L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Sophie Uijtewaal
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.