Teams

Brown/Gilbert/JB

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 3.5 Women Isolated Teams

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-30vs Lucky/McGehee/BPLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeana Muegge / Teri Raborn vs Stephanie Bierbaum / Susan Frost1-6, 4-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Lynch / Beverly Edens vs Terry Wood / Julie West4-6, 0-6
2025-04-12vs Lucky/McGehee/BPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorie Whitby / Deana Muegge vs Terry Wood / Susan Frost6-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Brown / Donna Gilbert vs Alesia Lucky / Kelly Keller6-2, 6-4
2025-03-08vs Venable/MHWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon McDaniel / Beverly Edens vs Deanna Garretson / Toni Fisher7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Calhoun / Starla Denton vs Phyllis Venable / Carolyn Kelley6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Gilbert / Karen Lynch vs Linda Robertson / Mary Bennett5-7, 3-4
2025-03-08vs Venable/MHLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Brown / Teri Raborn vs Deanna Garretson / Toni Fisher2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLorie Whitby / Marjie Playter vs Phyllis Venable / Carolyn Kelley5-7, 4-1
L#3 DoublesSharon McDaniel / Cindy Calhoun vs Linda Robertson / Mary Bennett6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Isolated Teams have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Lorie Whitby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Beverly Edens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindy Calhoun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Deana Muegge
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Donna Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marjie Playter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Starla Denton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Raborn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorie Whitby
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Beverly Edens
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Cindy Calhoun
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deana Muegge
13W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Donna Gilbert
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marjie Playter
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Starla Denton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teri Raborn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.