Teams

Gwynne-Lucky Strings-Woodlands

*2026 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-06vs Brown-Serves You Right-BentwaterWon 40
W#1 DoublesYvette Gwynne / Andrea Lima vs Stacee Verkon / Diana LaDoe6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSamara Panchalingam / Laura Joseph vs Lisa Brown / Jeanne Rossi5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Jill Rupert6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristy Drickamer / Paige Erkmann vs Helen Haig / Kristin Berbling6-2, 6-2
2026-06-30vs Spartz-Voice Let-WoodlandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Lembcke / Rainie Crawley vs Angela Carroway / Jennifer Spartz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLara Crouch / Janet Beckman vs Heather Carson / Andrea Escobar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYvette Gwynne / Kelly King vs Dee Howell / Sofia Garcia6-2, 6-0
2026-06-23vs Brengel-Set2Win-WoodlandsLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Speer / Kathleen Lembcke vs Samantha Paul / Tara Brengel5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Karen Seefeldt6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Atnipp / Kim Hartline vs Hillary Zuniga / Natashia Douglas3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennie Hughes / Samara Panchalingam vs Gretchen Williamson / Tina Kirby2-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs Andrews-All About that Ace-MNWLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Atnipp / Kim Hartline vs Leigh Booher / Liz Bergh6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Hattie Lane0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Drickamer / Janet Beckman vs Margot Vossler / Carrie Rigas5-7, 2-6
2026-06-01vs Brengel-Set2Win-WoodlandsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Lindsey Carroll6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRainie Crawley / Shannon Speer vs Hillary Zuniga / Nicole Luca2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lembcke / Amy Atnipp vs Karen Seefeldt / Jenny Driver6-0, 6-4
2026-05-26vs Spartz-Voice Let-WoodlandsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennie Hughes / Kim Hartline vs Rhenalea Beck / Jackie Burns6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Jennifer Spartz6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTina Battle / Lara Crouch vs Angela Carroway / Karen Hehir4-6, 6-7
2026-05-13vs Brown-Serves You Right-BentwaterWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Hartline / Amy Atnipp vs Stacee Verkon / Carol Viktorin6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lembcke / Rainie Crawley vs Helen Haig / Cathy Karka6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly King / Paige Erkmann vs Reagan Mann / Kristin Berbling6-1, 6-2
2026-05-06vs Andrews-All About that Ace-MNWWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Atnipp / Kelly King vs Liz Bergh / Stacey White6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRainie Crawley / Shannon Speer vs Melissa Andrews / Margot Vossler6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCourtney Keller Davis vs Tara Morgan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Joseph / Paige Erkmann vs Deborah Lasky / Gloria Tann6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gwynne-Lucky Strings-Woodlands7132820234
2Brengel-Set2Win-Woodlands71281225265
3Andrews-All About that Ace-MNW44231737305
4Brown-Serves You Right-Bentwater26132760401
5Spartz-Voice Let-Woodlands0843674466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Amy Atnipp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.06
Courtney Keller Davis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Rainie Crawley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Jennie Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Paige Erkmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Laura Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Yvette Gwynne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Shannon Speer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Becky Corbin
published 3
2.59
Christy Drickamer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Lara Crouch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Janet Beckman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tina Battle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Beckman + Christy Drickamer224 matchesnot enough data
Lara Crouch + Janet Beckman123 matchesnot enough data
Lara Crouch + Christy Drickamer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Atnipp
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Courtney Keller Davis
11W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Rainie Crawley
10W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jennie Hughes
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Paige Erkmann
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Laura Joseph
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Yvette Gwynne
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Shannon Speer
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Becky Corbin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Christy Drickamer
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lara Crouch
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Janet Beckman
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Tina Battle
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.