Teams

SGV Noobies A-Han-San Marino HS/SA2

2026 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Men 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs SGV Hit and Run-Rodriguez-WN/SU2Won 20
W#1 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Shaan Arora6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlexander Ko vs Mark Messana6-0, 6-0
2026-03-14vs SGV LLW Grinders -Vo-La Habra/SU2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlan Han vs Pablo Primucci5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs Ky Vo2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRand Lee vs Ryan Cox2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Ko vs Nicholas Ambrosio6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs Bill Petrocelli2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJason Nam vs Arturo Mateos7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRichard Phung vs Victor Paitimusa4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDastan Mazhetayev vs Judah Momon6-3, 6-3
2026-02-07vs SGV Hit and Run-Rodriguez-WN/SU2Won 30
W#1 SinglesAlexander Ko vs Tunde Alele6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJason Nam vs Khang Nguyen6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRand Lee vs George Rodriguez6-4, 6-1
2026-02-01vs SGV LLW Grinders -Vo-La Habra/SU2Won 21
W#1 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Michael Pang6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRichard Phung vs Hien Le5-7, 3-0
L#3 SinglesWallace Lee vs Ryan Cox2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAlan Han vs Nicholas Ambrosio6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRichard Phung vs Bill Petrocelli3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesDastan Mazhetayev vs Arturo Mateos6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Chris Lin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWallace Lee vs Spinner Chingon Fok2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs Victor Paitimusa4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Alexander Ko
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
He Yang Li
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Leonardo Kim
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
4.17
Alan Han
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Jason Nam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.04
Richard Phung
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.00
Dastan Mazhetayev
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.79
Wallace Lee
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.60
Rand Lee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexander Ko
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
He Yang Li
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Alan Han
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Jason Nam
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
Richard Phung
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Dastan Mazhetayev
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.00
Wallace Lee
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Rand Lee
2W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.