Teams

TOC.Hollett

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-02vs TOHS.CroneWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Latzy / Susan Newton vs Andrea Hough / Ines Murman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Tracy Lowrance vs Brittany Friedman / Devon Wadsworth6-1, 6-4
2022-09-18vs TOHS.CroneWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Latzy / Anna Stark vs Devon Wadsworth / Brittany Friedman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTracy Lowrance / Mary Hansen vs Brittany Rook / Lauren Hiller6-0, 6-0
2022-09-18vs TOHS.CroneWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Cunningham / Kimberly Latzy vs Claudia Bownes / Melissa Valero6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Hansen / Tracy Lowrance vs Olenna Tysiak-Bone / Theresa Crone6-3, 6-4
2022-09-09vs TOHS.CroneWon 20
W#1 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Kimberly Latzy vs Mallory Sikes / Brittany Friedman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Lowrance / Caroline Cunningham vs Molly Schneider / Claudia Bownes1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-14vs TOHS.CroneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Latzy / Sylina Huynh vs Brittany Friedman / Devon Wadsworth3-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca King / Tracy Lowrance vs Michele Cohen / Olenna Tysiak-Bone6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-12vs TOHS.CroneWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Lowrance / Kimberly Latzy vs Theresa Crone / Claudia Bownes6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Susan Newton
published
3.24
Kimberly Latzy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.99
Anna Stark
published 3
2.83
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.69
Kay Jackson
published
Mary Hansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Lowrance + Kimberly Latzy7080% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Newton
30W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Kimberly Latzy
111W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Anna Stark
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Audrey Hollett
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
Kay Jackson
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Mary Hansen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.