Teams

Southwest/Ferris/55&over/6.0M

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southwest/Ferris/55&over/6.0M8018615161
2GEPTA/55&over/Tepsick/TW35101432242
3GEPTA/55&over/6.0M/Andalis/EPTC#11781635256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Ernesto Garcia Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.37
Bernardo Escudero
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.98
Bill Ruddock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.31
Collins Preston
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
2.19
Hector Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
Juan Taveras
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kevin Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Ferris
published
Miguel Prieto
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
RAUL SANTILLAN AMADOR
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Steven King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Taveras + Collins Preston11019% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez + Bill Ruddock6455% gamesnot enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian + Kevin Woodson314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Woodson + Hector Mendoza224 matchesnot enough data
Juan Taveras + Steven King123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ernesto Garcia Padilla
14W–5L career · type S · 19 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Bernardo Escudero
38W–29L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3
Bill Ruddock
77W–83L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
2.5
Collins Preston
18W–71L career · 28 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Hector Mendoza
24W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Juan Taveras
6W–42L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
109W–95L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ferris
11W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Miguel Prieto
11W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
33W–50L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
RAUL SANTILLAN AMADOR
13W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.