Teams

WH Willmeng SL A65-7.0W

2025 WMI SL USTA League Adult 65&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SL A65&O 7.0 W (6 player)

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Nancy McCune vs Becky Kuhn / Cynthia Swain4-6, 2-6
2025-07-30vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Beattie / Nancy McCune vs Becky Kuhn / Rennae Cole6-2, 6-4
2025-07-23vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Nancy McCune vs Brenda Stagg / Rennae Cole7-6, 6-6
2025-07-16vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Beattie / Nancy McCune vs Danuta Radzio / Julie Gardzinski6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-09vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Beattie / Nancy McCune vs Julie Gardzinski / Danuta Radzio0-6, 6-7
2025-06-25vs MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy McCune / Terri Beattie vs Erin Fouty / Cynthia Swain6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WMI SL A65&O 7.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Gardzinski SL A65-7.0W4211716153
2WH Willmeng SL A65-7.0W2471123182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joan Hannadarrell
published
3.25
Terri Beattie
published
3.15
Nancy McCune
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Susan Einspahr
published
3.07
Maryann Willmeng
published
2.96
Patricia Guernsey
published
2.91
Debra Doerschler
published 3.5
2.74
Gale Nicholson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Einspahr + Joan Hannadarrell7558% games+6.4% vs expected
Terri Beattie + Patricia Guernsey1443% games+0.9% vs expected
Nancy McCune + Terri Beattie3945% games−0.6% vs expected
Debra Doerschler + Patricia Guernsey3348% games−4.8% vs expected
Maryann Willmeng + Debra Doerschler5746% games−4.8% vs expected
Gale Nicholson + Patricia Guernsey0631% games−13.9% vs expected
Joan Hannadarrell + Pamela Jane Mansager8068% gamesnot enough data
Maryann Willmeng + Nancy McCune2448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan Hannadarrell
189W–119L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Terri Beattie
116W–126L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Nancy McCune
75W–143L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Susan Einspahr
45W–47L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Maryann Willmeng
44W–54L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Patricia Guernsey
60W–63L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Debra Doerschler
32W–52L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Gale Nicholson
24W–43L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Pamela Jane Mansager
42W–45L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.