Teams

SConnor (Providence County Club)

2024 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-30vs JCarnahan (Palisades)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Duggins / Patricia Beatty vs Elizabeth Chuck / Jill Carnahan0-6, 0-6
2024-09-23vs LCranford (Sardis)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMimi Carbone / Jan Aspey vs Laura Weisner / Susan Crosby0-6, 1-6
2024-09-12vs HDaly (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMimi Carbone / Jan Aspey vs Tonja Padgett / Elizabeth Rudder0-6, 3-6
2024-09-09vs LSobodash (Pine Lake)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMimi Carbone / Lisa Duggins vs Sharon Surrett / Karan Waddell5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJan Aspey / Carol King vs Julie Selz / Linda Bollag4-6, 2-6
2024-08-26vs TAmos/TLoughlin-Young (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Duggins / Jan Aspey vs Sandy Johnson / Tracey Hunt6-7, 1-6
2024-08-19vs CLetorney (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Duggins / Mimi Carbone vs Sheryl Reynolds / Amy LaPenta4-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs EGold/ENeligan (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Kreisher / Jan Aspey vs Virginia Herran / Elizabeth Neligan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Pam Richardson
published
2.88
Jean Kreisher
published
2.77
Lisa Duggins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Jan Aspey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
Sally Connor
published 3
2.41
Patricia Beatty
published
2.40
Judi Affeldt
published
2.25
Barbara van Meerten
published 2.5
Kay Porter
published
Lori Ash
published
Mimi Carbone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Connor + Jan Aspey044 matchesnot enough data
Jan Aspey + Lisa Duggins134 matchesnot enough data
Sally Connor + Lisa Duggins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Richardson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jean Kreisher
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Lisa Duggins
17W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Jan Aspey
22W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Sally Connor
20W–46L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
Patricia Beatty
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
Judi Affeldt
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Barbara van Meerten
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25
Kay Porter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Ash
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mimi Carbone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.