Teams

DNagelhout-HS

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29vs AHabib-HRSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDave Thomas / Van Blalock vs Jeff Russell / Jerome Croan4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Evert / David Nagelhout vs Robert Long / Brian Goldman6-0, 6-3
2025-04-22vs CFisher-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDave Thomas / David Nagelhout vs Charles Fisher / Donald Emmett6-0, 6-1
2025-04-08vs AHabib-HRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Kempel / David Nagelhout vs Ashraf Habib / Jeff Russell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDave Thomas / Van Blalock vs Rodney Matthews / James Bowers6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-04-01vs CFisher-CHTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesDavid Evert / David Nagelhout vs Donald Emmett / Alan Furan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Denhard / Van Blalock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-18vs AHabib-HRSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJeff Denhard / Mike Liller vs Ashraf Habib / James Bowers6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Russell Davis vs Robert Long / Brian Goldman3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-11vs CFisher-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Jones / Jeff Denhard vs Donald Emmett / Franck Seguin6-2, 6-0
2025-02-25vs AHabib-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Rexrode / David Nagelhout vs George Corbett / Jerome Croan0-6, 1-6
2025-02-18vs CFisher-CHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Evert / Andy Jones vs Joseph Kennedy / Bill Stewart4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDave Thomas / David Nagelhout vs Alan Furan / David Ward6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Denhard / Russell Davis vs Donald Emmett / Ashok Krishnamurthy6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mike Kempel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Dave Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
David Evert
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Russell Davis
published
2.77
Jeff Denhard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Mike Liller
published
2.69
Hayes Hofler
published 3
2.63
Van Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.62
David Nagelhout
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.61
Andy Jones
published 3
2.17
David Naden
published 2.5
Thomas Rexrode
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Thomas + Andy Jones1541% games−1.5% vs expected
David Evert + David Nagelhout2343% gamesnot enough data
Dave Thomas + David Evert404 matchesnot enough data
Dave Thomas + David Naden224 matchesnot enough data
David Nagelhout + Jeff Denhard224 matchesnot enough data
Dave Thomas + Jeff Denhard213 matchesnot enough data
Dave Thomas + Mike Liller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Kempel
39W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
3
Dave Thomas
34W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
David Evert
35W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Russell Davis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Jeff Denhard
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Mike Liller
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Hayes Hofler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%16%84%
2.63
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Andy Jones
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
David Naden
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Thomas Rexrode
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.