Teams

MARION/Copeland/Women/5.5

2022 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-14vs GO - TompkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Deana Mathes vs Betsy Calder / Barbara Center6-4, 7-5
2022-11-07vs FK - LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Greene / Rhonda Sangster vs Rebecca Long / Patricia Tremblay6-2, 6-3
2022-10-28vs GO - TompkinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Ardis Giddings vs Chrissy Hollnagel / Lynn Crowe6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Lucy Kaul
published
3.07
Janet Greene
published
2.82
Lauren Joyce
published
2.76
Ardis Giddings
published 3
Kayleen Quinn
published
Monique Foster
published
Rhonda Sangster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Lauren Joyce
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Ardis Giddings
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Kayleen Quinn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Foster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.