Teams

HFTC - Go Getters

*2023 Houston Fall League (2022) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 4.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-29vs MPTC - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesChelsea Grear / Meghan Rovelli vs Liana Gonzalez / Sydney Shatz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-22vs South Shore-Happy HourLost 01
L#1 DoublesChelsea Grear / Meghan Rovelli vs Kelsey McNeil / Beatrice Vallejo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-15vs MPTC - GNOLost 01
L#1 DoublesChelsea Grear / Meghan Rovelli vs Crystal Fain / Kimberly Elliott5-7, 2-6
2022-10-25vs MPTC - Stryke ForceLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Evans-Brooks / Meghan Rovelli vs Lisa Cohen / Mary Volf3-6, 0-6
2022-10-18vs South Shore-Happy HourWon 10
W#1 DoublesChelsea Grear / Meghan Rovelli vs Kelsey McNeil / Shannon Sobkowiak6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Tammy Nasse
published
4.26
Debanjolee Das
published 4.5
4.15
Chelsea Grear
published 4.5
3.98
Flona Francis
published 4
3.92
Meghan Rovelli
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Sharon Evans-Brooks
published
Aimee Wilson
published 4
3.64
Irma Peterson
published 4
Brittany Lindsey
published
Tomomi Tsuchiya
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debanjolee Das + Tammy Nasse6261% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Nasse
56W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Debanjolee Das
40W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Chelsea Grear
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.15
4
Flona Francis
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Meghan Rovelli
67W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jeri Lynn Richard-Brantley
24W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Sharon Evans-Brooks
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Aimee Wilson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Irma Peterson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Brittany Lindsey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tomomi Tsuchiya
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.