Teams

ETurkus (Springfield)

2025 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-23vs ACombs (BCC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesAnnmarie Ringle vs Amy Combs6-1, 6-2
2025-07-20vs RDuffy/SOsadnick (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#2 SinglesChristy ACEVEDO vs Zahide Marenic6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAnnmarie Ringle vs Rhonda Tate3-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs CWarner/JZarambo (WSRC)Split 11
W#2 SinglesChristy ACEVEDO vs Kimberly Borans6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAnnmarie Ringle vs Tasha Cooper2-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs KDay (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesSherry Hayden vs Annabet Smith6-3, 7-6
2025-06-30Lost 01
L#3 SinglesSherry Hayden vs Alexis Schwartz2-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs ACombs (BCC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnnmarie Ringle vs Rachel Miller1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSherry Hayden vs Amy Combs6-3, 6-2
2025-06-11vs CWarner/JZarambo (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesChristy ACEVEDO vs Victoria Sofarelli6-4, 6-1
2025-06-04vs RDuffy/SOsadnick (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesSherry Hayden vs Zahide Marenic4-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs KDay (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesErica Turkus vs Jimena Lozano de Bermudez6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnnmarie Ringle vs Angie Mehrizi1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Christy ACEVEDO
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Natalie Costello
published
2.87
Erica Turkus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Kara Ward
published
2.77
Sarah Nitsche
published
Amanda Zenger
published 3
2.69
Annmarie Ringle
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.06
Sherry Hayden
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Julie Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Ward + Erica Turkus3251% gamesnot enough data
Annmarie Ringle + Erica Turkus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy ACEVEDO
63W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Natalie Costello
23W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Erica Turkus
74W–86L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kara Ward
30W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Sarah Nitsche
32W–47L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amanda Zenger
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Annmarie Ringle
36W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Sherry Hayden
11W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Julie Swanson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.