Teams

NJ NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs RHCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Shugrue / Patti Warner vs Jennifer Curtis-Jones / Mindi Pearse3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Carla Grumann6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Miranda / Valerie Martin vs Maria Lucas / Rebecca Jones2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCassandra Gallegos / Leslie Tancredo vs Jue Abrahamson / Jody Alderman5-7, 0-6
2024-07-08vs HIW GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPatti Warner / Mary Shugrue vs Kelly Murphy / Rhonda Wilson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesValerie Martin / Jill Orsatti vs Linda Nielander / CAROLINE MCQUEEN4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNina Miranda / Kathleen Gerbino vs Ira Chang-Richmond / Megan Curtiss7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-01vs LTC-D GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesMary Shugrue / Patti Warner vs Judith McKinney / Kelly Costanzo6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Carissa Zook7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Martin / Jill Orsatti vs Karen Noreyko / Moira Blake6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Tancredo / Cassandra Gallegos vs Betsy Duryea / Kristine O'Brien6-2, 7-5
2024-06-24vs BP GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Orsatti / Valerie Martin vs Mara Orchard / Meredith Barnes4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Emily Adams1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Shugrue / Christine Gilpatric vs Ashley Lougheed / Lauren Shrensky6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNina Miranda / Leslie Tancredo vs Molly Buller / Angela Martin2-6, 3-6
2024-06-17vs MC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Shugrue / Meredith Beveridge vs Ashley Campsie / Kristen Hoffman6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Susan Pesso4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Gilpatric / Leslie Tancredo vs Katie Policaro / Patty Archuleta7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Gerbino / Cassandra Gallegos vs Anya Civitella / Angela Messinger1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-10vs NJ BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJill Orsatti / Dorelle Peters vs Nicole Cotta / Janie Trevor6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Amanda Strouth2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Shugrue / Patti Warner vs Mary Rose Wilder / Carolyn Keim7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNina Miranda / Leslie Tancredo vs Melissa Gatlin / Shannon Hempelman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-03vs MVCC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesMary Shugrue / Patti Warner vs Kate Colon / Kristin Mazzarese6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Madeleine Futterman5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNina Miranda / Meredith Beveridge vs Kimberly Hitchcock / Marci Grant2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCassandra Gallegos / Leslie Tancredo vs Linda Lea / Julie Levey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Meredith Beveridge
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Jill Orsatti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Mary Shugrue
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.85
Patti Warner
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Christine Gilpatric
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Gerbino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Cassandra Gallegos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Nina Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Valerie Martin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Dorelle Peters
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Leslie Tancredo
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Tancredo + Valerie Martin5149% games+16.0% vs expected
Patti Warner + Mary Shugrue8263% games+4.7% vs expected
Mary Shugrue + Meredith Beveridge13460% games+1.8% vs expected
Jill Orsatti + Patti Warner8556% games−0.9% vs expected
Jill Orsatti + Nina Miranda1639% games−12.0% vs expected
Cassandra Gallegos + Valerie Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Gerbino + Nina Miranda224 matchesnot enough data
Nina Miranda + Valerie Martin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meredith Beveridge
89W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Jill Orsatti
62W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Mary Shugrue
127W–93L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
Patti Warner
46W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Christine Gilpatric
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kathleen Gerbino
55W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cassandra Gallegos
24W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Nina Miranda
59W–87L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Valerie Martin
37W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Dorelle Peters
35W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Leslie Tancredo
20W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.